Search for: "State v. Wines" Results 941 - 960 of 1,026
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2016, 8:23 am by Geoffrey
  It is the State and its Courts that have authority to coerce a Party who has not complied with his bargain. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 10:30 pm by Ingo Venzke
The advertising ban at issue does not appear comparable to an advertising ban on alcohol where in most Member States there is particular local production of beers or wines that may be more familiar to local consumers. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 4:32 am
Someone recently asked me what Lawrence v Texas was about. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 12:24 pm by Glenn
Even if they are correct, the parties pressing for government antitrust action against Google cannot claim the courts have ever recognized the concept of natural monopoly as a surrogate for the United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 7:52 am
I must, of course, leave this rather long post with a bit of Shakespeare - Henry V: O noble English! [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:00 pm by Old Fox
Cranmer accepted a commission to write a propaganda treatise in the king’s interest, stating the course he proposed and defending it by arguments from Scripture, the Fathers, and the decrees of general councils. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:42 am by Terry Hart
This is especially helpful because the legal and colloquial definitions of monopoly differ throughout history — the term means something different under the current Sherman Antitrust Act, to someone during the era of trust-busting in early 20th century United States, and to a jurist in 18th century England. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
  “Rather, the theories of the administrative state, the public interest, and the judicial process were part of the general atmosphere of thought surrounding the justices. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 8:59 am by Mark Bennett
They have some wine, one thing leads to another, and they decide they want to have sex. [read post]