Search for: "Strong v Thomas" Results 941 - 960 of 1,954
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2009, 11:30 am
”   (Since Justices Scalia and Thomas said they joined the Alito opinion “in full,” Alito’s reference to the Establishment Clause was not strong enough to deny the opinion their support.) [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 1:43 pm
But as a courtesy to O'Malley, Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:46 am by David Greene
This history also attains greater relevance in light of Justice Thomas’s recent troubling call for the U.S. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Catherine Padhi
The passage of time without injury may weaken a strong presumption in plaintiffs’ favor. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Given this taxonomy of interpretive styles, how would we characterize Justice Clarence Thomas’s opinion in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 11:29 am
Category: 103     By: Jesus Hernandez, Blog Editor/Contributor     TitleHoffmann-La Roche, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Nicholas Stephanopolous assesses the relevance of last week’s strong Democratic election showing in Virginia to the issues in the Supreme Court’s pending partisan-gerrymandering case, Gill v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
Back in 2012, it was crystal clear (to me anyway) that Justice Kagan should recuse herself from the important Obama Care case NFIB v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Stephen Griffin
  As Kersch comments, in both of these widely seen film series, “Roe v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For example, Justice Sotomayor’s opinion for the Court last year in Dubin v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 10:07 am by Andree Blumstein
Thomas views coercion as the true touchstone of establishment clause inquiry. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 10:25 am by Gregory Magarian
— Gregory Magarian is the Thomas and Karole Green Professor of Law. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am by John Elwood
Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch, dissented from denial of certiorari in Garco, writing that it “would have been an ideal case to reconsider” Auer deference, which he said “frustrates the notice and predictability purposes of rulemaking, and promotes arbitrary government. [read post]