Search for: "TECHNICAL PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC."
Results 941 - 960
of 1,404
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2011, 4:10 pm
(citing Sundance, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 4:00 pm
Universal City Studios, Inc. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:52 pm
Rogers, Jr. issued the public version of the Initial Determination (“ID”) (dated August 31, 2011) denying a motion by Complainants Thompson/Center Arms Company, Inc. and Smith & Wesson Corp. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 12:56 pm
Technical issues are a barrier. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 8:11 am
., Inc., Individually and as Successor to Mundet Cork Corporation, Respondent. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 1:41 pm
We can't expect companies to invest billions of dollars and then subject them to a permitting process that drags on for years with no end in sight. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:06 pm
Papikian Enterprises, Inc., 2011 WL 5192237 (N.D. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 7:28 am
Inc., 984 F.2d 1182, 1193 (Fed.Cir.1993). [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:31 pm
In Jacksonville Bulk Terminals, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 2:59 am
The company's other products were distributed in as many as 16 states, including all of California.By 1985, Gary S. and Susan McPherson -- a former accountant and his wife from Pasadena --- had owned Jalisco Mexican Products Inc. for about four years. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 4:29 pm
Nimonik inc. was established in mid-2008 in Montreal, Canada. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 4:53 am
The Kat had this brilliant idea for what you get when you cross 'Neutrokine-a' with 'genome' Hot off the press and not yet digested, this morning's ruling of the United Kingdom's Supreme Court in Human Genome Sciences Inc. v Eli Lilly and Company [2011] UKSC 51, will be the subject of considerable analysis in the coming days and weeks. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 3:06 pm
All the big tech companies that sell MS software with their products should be in on this too. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:38 am
281/10 P, PepsiCo, Inc. v Grupo Promer Mon Graphic SA, Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, has so far received less attention than it deserves. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
The trial court agreed with the company on both issues and dismissed the complaint. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
§ 102(b)(3) consistent with existing trade secret law.[21] Under trade secret law, trade secrets are often defined in terms of whether information has been made available to the public through distribution of a completed product.[22] In essence, if a member of the public can readily reverse engineer a product such that the underlying technology, method, or method of manufacture can be understood, there is no trade secret protection for that… [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 9:13 am
The Textron Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm
Danek Medical, Inc., 520 S.E.2d 88, 92 (N.C. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 5:39 am
On June 23, 2011 in PLIVA, Inc v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:50 am
This settlement relates to a contract Oracle entered into in 1998 to sell software licenses and technical support to government entities through GSA’s Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) program. [read post]
