Search for: "Taking Offense v. California" Results 941 - 960 of 1,495
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2021, 8:17 am by Eric Halliday, Rachael Hanna
That reaction followed a pattern over recent years in which mass shootings and other violent attacks—like those in El Paso, Texas; Gilroy, California; and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania—have spurred demands for an increased federal focus on domestic terrorism. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
But a Californian court has held he was engaged in protected First Amendment speech when he seized the microphone at a bingo game and began calling offensive versions of the numbers. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 10:15 am by Dennis Crouch
Since that decision, the First Amendment right to free expression permits citizens to seek registration of racially offensive trademarks. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 11:28 am by Lyrissa Lidsky
  The user of the online forum ordinarily must take some kind of affirmative step to seek out comments by fellow users; even once a user decides to read the comments, she can easily scroll past the ones that appear to be offensive. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973) (upholding criminalization of obscenity); Smith v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 9:17 pm
California, profanity and offensive speech is constitutionally protected, outside of narrow categories (such as fighting words or threats) that simply do not arise in the context of a crowd of 15,000 screaming sports fans. [read post]
The University of Washington’s own Professor Eric Schnapper is involved in the Gonzalez v. [read post]