Search for: "Taking Offense v. California" Results 941 - 960 of 1,481
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2013, 3:51 pm
 Exactly the kind of law we should pass (and enforce).In the first part of its opinion, the Appellate Division holds that the statute -- California Fish and Game Code Section 8278(a) -- is a regulatory offense, and hence imposes strict liability. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 5:03 am by Susan Brenner
’ Taking this circuitous route, the court observed, `would equate a user with a provider and, thus, ignore language in § 2701(c) that treats users and providers as different.' [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm by Steve Sady
We are betraying our duty of zealous representation if we fail to advocate against enhancements using all the authority at our disposal.Dear Defender:So if the Court basically is just sticking by Taylor on an issue that covers many sentencing situations, why did the Court bother taking the case? [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 2:30 pm
 Surely you could not sue someone for this offense in California based merely on the fact that the assault might have an effect in California.Criminal and civil jurisdiction are not the same. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 8:30 pm by Kristin Bergman
California, Illinois, Michigan, Washington, and more have followed suit. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 4:49 am by Susan Brenner
After he was convicted of burglary in violation of California Penal Code § 459 and sentenced to four years in prison, Hoang V. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:56 pm by LindaMBeale
  They are-Hollingsworth v Perry (rejecting an appeal of the lower court decision overturning California's Proposition 8, on technical jurisdictional grounds), and US v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:46 am by Kedar Bhatia
California Coastal Commission (1987) and Dolan v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm by Kedar Bhatia
California Coastal Commission (1987) and Dolan v. [read post]