Search for: "Taylor v. State" Results 941 - 960 of 3,056
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Make whole any unit employees who retired during or after August 2011 and who have been required to contribute towards the cost of health insurance.* In Lippman v Sewanhaka Central High School District, 66 NY2d 313, the court held that health insurance was not a retirement benefit within the meaning of Article 5, Section 7, of the State Constitution.. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 12:40 am
An arbitrator issued the decision after a disciplinary grievance hearing conducted in accordance with the provisions of a Taylor Law agreement. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]; Goldfarb v Hoffman, 139 AD3d 474, 475 [1st Dept 2016]; Cascardo v Dratel, 171 AD3d 561, 562 [1st Dept 2019]; see CPLR 3211 [a] [1], [7]). [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 9:11 am
I guess we'll see.]Pamela Shareka Langham v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 8:00 pm by Lindsey Taylor
By Lindsey Taylor The issue of employees with environmental sensitivities often arises for Canadian employers. [read post]
11 May 2007, 2:18 pm
An interesting case from the Second Department Tuesday provides some answers - People v Taylor, 2007 NY Slip Op 04149. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 3:47 am
Taylor, falsely stated that there were no civil actions or USPTO proceedings pending against the DANTANNA’S mark and registration. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 5:08 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Similar to its federal counterpart, Utah Rule of Evidence 606(b) provides that (1) Prohibited Testimony or Other Evidence. [read post]