Search for: "Taylor v. State"
Results 941 - 960
of 3,086
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2008, 11:42 am
Another case, Taylor v Hammondsport CSD, 267 A.D.2d 987, brought by a teacher, David C. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:54 am
Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]; Goldfarb v Hoffman, 139 AD3d 474, 475 [1st Dept 2016]; Cascardo v Dratel, 171 AD3d 561, 562 [1st Dept 2019]; see CPLR 3211 [a] [1], [7]). [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 4:59 pm
Indeed, in State v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
Taylor, 917 F.2d at 1403; United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 9:37 am
Taylor v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 9:11 am
I guess we'll see.]Pamela Shareka Langham v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 4:51 am
Taylor v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 12:40 am
An arbitrator issued the decision after a disciplinary grievance hearing conducted in accordance with the provisions of a Taylor Law agreement. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 3:47 am
Taylor, falsely stated that there were no civil actions or USPTO proceedings pending against the DANTANNA’S mark and registration. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 8:38 am
Aubry Johnson v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 6:17 pm
See United States v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 2:18 pm
An interesting case from the Second Department Tuesday provides some answers - People v Taylor, 2007 NY Slip Op 04149. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 1:48 pm
But Wednesday's opinion in Patel v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:23 am
Morrow Porter Vermitsky & Taylor, PLLC, by John C. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
" §80-a of the Civil Service Law sets out similar provisions with respect to the layoff of employees in the noncompetitive class of the State as the employer. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
" §80-a of the Civil Service Law sets out similar provisions with respect to the layoff of employees in the noncompetitive class of the State as the employer. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:39 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 6:52 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
From Judge David Godbey's opinion today in Hazlewood v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 8:00 pm
By Lindsey Taylor The issue of employees with environmental sensitivities often arises for Canadian employers. [read post]
