Search for: "Three S Consulting v. US" Results 941 - 960 of 5,356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2017, 12:39 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 1988).After considering the claim language and the specification, a court may consult the final piece of intrinsic evidence: the patent's prosecution history. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 4:46 am by Susan Brenner
While serving as a legislator, he also worked as an administrator and then as a part-time consultant for the Newport News public schools system. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 10:25 am by Eilionoir Flynn
Last week the High Court issued a significant judgment in the case of MX v HSE. [read post]
22 May 2015, 12:26 pm
For example, in Marsh v Smyth, this Court reversed a motion court's Frye ruling. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” At Courthouse News Service, Barbara Leonard reports on Monday’s summary reversal in Dunn v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:30 pm by Lauren Bateman
Pen Registers and Trap and Trace Devices The testimony describes PR/TT devices as “[s]ome of the most useful, and lease intrusive, investigative tools available to both intelligence and law enforcement investigators. [read post]
26 May 2014, 5:14 am
The judge also pointed out that the 6th Circuit’s opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 8:44 am
Perhaps most significantly, Executive Order 13496 revoked former President Bush’s Executive Order 13201 of February 17, 2001, which required notice to employees of their rights not to join a union and not to pay agency fees for nonrepresentational union expenditures under Communication Workers of America v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:20 am by Wells C. Bennett
  Of Judge Walton’s three key findings, he says, two–that a Taliban operative recruited Suleiman, and that Suleiman traveled to an area near the frontlines of battle in Afghanistan–can be freely discussed in open session. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 5:44 am
 However in future cases the reference to ‘right(s)’ may be used to achieve more relaxed interpretations of – in particular – the final step of the three-step test, which mandates upon exceptions and limitations not to cause an unreasonable prejudice to the legitimate interests of the rightholder. [read post]