Search for: "Toy v. Toy" Results 941 - 960 of 1,669
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Where a clear explanation of proposed rules and its requirements are provided by the adopting public entity, the entity's provided a full rationale for adopting the rule is not required at the time of its promulgation if the record reveals that the rule had a rational basis
1 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Given the CCRB's expertise in studying and investigating police disciplinary matters, we defer to its interpretation of the term "abuse of authority," unless that definition is irrational, unreasonable, or inconsistent with the governing statute (see Matter of Toys "R" Us v Silva, 89 NY2d 411, 418-419 [1996]). [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Where a clear explanation of proposed rules and its requirements are provided by the adopting public entity, the entity's provided a full rationale for adopting the rule is not required at the time of its promulgation if the record reveals that the rule had a rational basis
1 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Given the CCRB's expertise in studying and investigating police disciplinary matters, we defer to its interpretation of the term "abuse of authority," unless that definition is irrational, unreasonable, or inconsistent with the governing statute (see Matter of Toys "R" Us v Silva, 89 NY2d 411, 418-419 [1996]). [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Trademark Dilution and Sex: Victor's Secrets v. Victoria's Secrets
18 Jun 2010, 3:43 pm
By: Jeffrey Pietsch Victor’s Secret, a small store in Kentucky selling adult videos and sex toys, lost another battle in a trademark dilution case brought by Victoria’s Secret. [read post]
IP Law Blog - http://www.theiplawblog.com/
“Not Much Good Takes Place at Slumber Parties for High School Kids, and This Case Proves the Point”
12 Aug 2011, 5:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
No. 403 v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://volokh.com
$70,000 Non-Pecuniary Damages Awarded for Patellafemoral Pain Syndrome
2 Jun 2009, 1:58 pm
Grand & Toy Alberta Ltd., [1978] 2 S.C.R. 229 at 260-265; and Kuskis v. [read post]
ICBC Law - http://bc-injury-law.com/blog/
Absolute Liability of Corporations
18 Dec 2007, 2:08 pm
In Irwin Toy Ltd. v. [read post]
Law is Cool - http://lawiscool.com
Fosamax MDL Judge Keenan Wants Two More Bellwether Case Trials: February 4, 2011 Order
8 Feb 2011, 11:25 am by Tom Lamb
Merck) and May 2011 (Hester v. [read post]
Drug Injury Watch - http://www.drug-injury.com/druginjurycom/
The Pedagogical Constitution
23 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
NEW YORK GOVERNOR ANDREW CUOMO’S RESIGNATION SERVES AS A CLEAR WARNING TO NEW JERSEY EMPLOYERS TO HOLD THEIR EMPLOYEES ACCOUNTABLE FOR ACTS OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT AND RETALIATION IN THE WORKPLACE
19 Aug 2021, 10:38 am by Mashel Law, L.L.C.
Romano v. [read post]
New Jersey Employment Attorneys Blog - http://www.newjerseyemploymentattorneysblog.com/
Friday fantasies
3 Jun 2010, 9:51 pm
Here's news of a new search and information toy from the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). [read post]
IPKat - http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/
Can you copyright the Klingon language?
30 Apr 2016, 4:04 am by Andres
Occasionally there are cases that seem to be tailor-made for legal geeks: Naruto v Slater; Lucasfilm v Ainsworth; DC Comics v Towle. [read post]
TechnoLlama - http://www.technollama.co.uk
Kozinski KO's Barbie
4 Aug 2010, 6:30 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Unique Indus., 912 F.2d 663, 670-71 (3d Cir. 1990) (animal nose masks have no utilitarian function apart from portraying appearance of animal nose); Gay Toys, Inc. v. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
WIRTW #142 (“It’s the bitches that’ll get yas” edition)
3 Sep 2010, 5:48 am by Jon Hyman
Earlier this month, the Second Circuit, in Pucino v. [read post]
Ohio Employer's Law Blog - http://ohioemploymentlaw.blogspot.com/
Choice of law clauses are not promissory
4 Aug 2009, 12:09 am
 The recent Australian case of Ace Insurance Ltd v Moose Enterprise Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 724  discusses an important question of principle concerning contractual choice of law clauses: are they promissory terms of the contract or  merely declaratory of the parties’ intention? [read post]
Conflict of Laws .net - http://conflictoflaws.net
Skadden Discusses How Supreme Court Decision in Jack Daniel’s May Affect AI-Generated Works
15 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
v=pIJSKxVJppA. 3 Rogers v. [read post]
The CLS Blue Sky Blog - https://clsbluesky.law.columbia.edu/
Does Louis Vuitton’s Loss to a Parody Defense Justify an Award of Attorney Fees?
28 Jan 2016, 6:14 am by Tim Sitzmann
However, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Octane Fitness v. [read post]
Duets Blog - http://www.duetsblog.com/
Products Liability Claim Against Manufacturer of Massachusetts Fire Truck Fails for Lack of Expert Testimony – King v. Pierce Manufacturing, Inc.
12 May 2015, 2:47 pm by John C. Manoog III
The Facts of the Case In the recent case of King v. [read post]
Cape Cod Injury Lawyer Blog - http://www.capecodinjurylawyerblog.com/
First Circuit Upholds Doctrine of Uberrimae Fidei Requiring a Marine Insurance Policyholder to Act in “Utmost Good Faith”
28 Feb 2021, 9:23 am by Joe Trytten
Co. v. [read post]
Admiralty & Maritime - https://mblb.com/admiralty-maritime/
McCoy loses appeal at CAFC, BUT there is an interesting contrast between a "person of ordinary skill" and an expert
1 Apr 2021, 10:08 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Innovention Toys, 637 F.3d at 1323; Elbit Sys. of Am., LLC v. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2013 [Part One]
17 Jan 2014, 5:49 am
Inc. v. [read post]
The TTABlog - http://thettablog.blogspot.com/