Search for: "Trademark Cases"
Results 941 - 960
of 23,985
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2023, 4:15 am
Below, we (1) explain what upcycling is, (2) discuss potential legal issues arising from upcycled products, (3) summarize recent cases involving upcycled products, and (4) propose successful brand protection measures. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 4:15 am
Below, we (1) explain what upcycling is, (2) discuss potential legal issues arising from upcycled products, (3) summarize recent cases involving upcycled products, and (4) propose successful brand protection measures. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 8:34 am
If we put this case to the side, the Rogers test has applied only to cases involving “non-trademark uses”—or otherwise said, cases in which “the defendant has used the mark” at issue in a “non-source-identifying way. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 7:03 am
(So, one thing that distinguishes this case from several other plaintiff-sues-original-author cases like Fogerty v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:44 am
(2) If such bad faith is found, what is the correct approach to determining the specification that the proprietor of the trademark should be permitted to retain? [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 5:11 pm
In one extreme case, Stockett v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 9:26 am
INTA 2023 International Roundtable: Trademark Prosecution and Enforcement in the UK after Sky v Skykick - 6 July at 9:30AMOn July 6th, INTA organises a roundtable on the topic of trademark prosecution and enforcement in the UK after Sky v Skykick, which will take place at the London offices of Pinsent Masons LLP in order to discuss on which way the Supreme Court should rule on the same case and why, and to consider the practical implications of each… [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 5:39 pm
In many cases, unfair competition claims involve either trademark infringement or false claims about a company’s products or services. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 4:18 pm
You also get to use a well-known trademark—so you can hit the ground running instead of trying to build a recognizable brand. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 8:42 am
While this case provides new clarity around both statutory fair use and judicial exceptions to trademark infringement, some factual specifics are worth noting. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 10:00 am
(“Parus”), the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) found a number of claims obvious over prior art. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 8:11 am
Following the Supreme Court’s decision earlier this month in the Jack Daniel’s dog toy trademark dispute, the Supreme Court has remanded a case against Disney to the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 7:22 am
The firm worked on trademark matters, including the marks this suit hinges on, for Reebok in the EU between 2015 and 2022, according to the memo. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
(See the briefs and amicus briefs filed in the Jack Daniel’s case, and Part I of my paper with Professor Farley.) [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 4:48 pm
Apple’s quest to own the IP rights of something as generic as a fruit speaks to the dynamics of a flourishing global IP rights industry, which encourages companies to compete obsessively over trademarks they don’t really need…” [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 10:46 am
In other cases, a fraudulent shipment is made: a container full of bricks, barrels full of water or sand, or a refrigerated container full of damaged clothes, flour instead of an expensive chemical, or rotten instead of fresh fish. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 7:58 am
Jun. 8, 2023) Juul, which makes vaping products including charging docks/cases and cables for the main devices, sued defendants for trademark infringement and counterfeiting. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 3:45 am
The trademark case was initiated due to VIP Products’ sales of a dog chew toy labeled “Bad Spaniels,” designed as a parody of Jack Daniel’s famous whiskey bottle. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm
”[12] The Supreme Court noted that Rogers was “a cabined doctrine” which “has applied only to cases involving ‘non-trademark uses’ – or otherwise said, cases in which ‘the defendant has used the mark’ at issue in a ‘non-source-identifying way. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am
”[12] The Supreme Court noted that Rogers was “a cabined doctrine” which “has applied only to cases involving ‘non-trademark uses’ – or otherwise said, cases in which ‘the defendant has used the mark’ at issue in a ‘non-source-identifying way. [read post]
