Search for: "US Inventor"
Results 941 - 960
of 8,096
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2011, 5:51 am
See also US 7,812,828 titled Ellipse fitting for multi-touch surfaces , inventors Westerman; Wayne (San Francisco, CA), Elias; John G. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 8:52 pm
The bling was pissing on inventors using shell companies in asserting their patents, at least one of whom got pissed, namely Eric M. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 7:10 am
When first written into the Constitution, intellectual property protections were intended to help foster the progress of science and the useful arts by granting rights to authors and inventors. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:24 am
appeared first on Top-Rated Orange County Patent Lawyer | Helping Inventors in Orange County, Los Angeles County & Beyond | OC Patent Lawyer, Irvine CA. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Copyright Office have each held that artificial intelligence systems cannot qualify as inventors or authors for ... [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 9:28 pm
The '607 patent does cite to US 5843780 issued December 1998 to ThomsonBongso is also a named inventor on the '607 patent. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 3:35 pm
Billionaire Bill Gates is offering $100,000 for an inventor to come up with a better condom. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 9:40 pm
Marketing efforts relate to the traditional bars to patentability such as demonstrating the invention to the public (i.e., public use), publicly offering the invention for sale (public offer for sale) or distributing a printed publication of the invention (i.e.., printed publication). [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:28 am
The articles do not, however, actually report that benzyl benzoate was used — it turns out though that the researchers (including one overlapping listed inventor here) used the same 40/60 split of castor oil and benzyl benzoate. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 3:07 pm
Of course, on the other side of things that legal battle is often the only tool the entrepreneur/inventor has; it is his sling to wield against Goliath. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 2:48 am
But Glenn Gould’s idea of “user rights” presents us with an interesting paradox. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 6:29 am
***Separately, the story on Chuck Williams of Williams-Sonoma featured how Williams would move ideas from Europe to the US, or from the professional cooking area to homes. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
Misjoinder is the error of naming a person as an inventor who is not an inventor; nonjoinder is the error of omitting an inventor. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 7:03 am
However, Congress did not expressly alter the “on sale” bar language that has been used as a source for the rule that an inventor’s pre-filing secret sales activities (or other commercializing uses) will bar later patenting. [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:55 pm
Inventors should also beware using so-called “invention promoters”. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 11:07 am
The inventors submitted three declarations evidencing the nonobviousness of their invention (unexpected results and teaching away), but the Board did not consider the evidence, finding that it related only to an intended use of the invention, which was not relevant as the claims were composition claims.The Federal Circuit vacated, finding that while discovery of a new use of a previously known compound does not make the compound patentable, here the claimed… [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 12:05 pm
It is disincentivizing inventors, innovators and investors! [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 3:26 am
The Bush administration wants to reform the nation's patent system by requiring better information from inventors and allowing public scrutiny of applications, according to the director of the government's patent office. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 9:38 am
Hockey fans will enjoy this story about two Canadian inventors suing a company for allegedly copying the design of their patented hockey equipment bag: Dropping the gloves over a hockey bag, Globe and Mail, Dec. 16, 2010.The bag is patented in Canada (CA 2145612) and the US (US 5,797,612). [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 10:27 am
In the lawsuit, ICR has asserted that Google infringes its US Patent No. 7,111,252. [read post]
