Search for: "US v. CLARK " Results 941 - 960 of 3,120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Clark Equipment Co., 122 S.W.3d 530, 533-37 (Ky. 2003); Tabieros v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Clark Equipment Co., 122 S.W.3d 530, 533-37 (Ky. 2003); Tabieros v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Clark Equipment Co., 122 S.W.3d 530, 533-37 (Ky. 2003); Tabieros v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:46 am
The Board observed that, although the words in a word + design mark like applicant's are usually accorded greater weight, in this case opposer K-C's mark comprises only the image of a puppy with its paw on a roll of toilet paper, "so rather than using words to call for Opposer’s goods, consumers might identify Opposer’s brand another way, perhaps by recalling and mentioning the dog, or 'the puppy with toilet paper.'" Kimberly-Clark… [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
There is no dispute that Lindquist personally bought the phone, pays for its monthly service, and sometimes uses it in the course of his job.Nissen v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:44 pm by Kaimipono D. Wenger
Manning Marable and Kristen Clarke) (PalgraveMacmillan 2009) On the Courthouse Lawn:  Confronting the Legacy of Lynching in the 21st Century (Beacon Press 2007) Through the Lens of Diversity: The Fight for Judicial Elections After Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 4:47 am by Susan Brenner
That is not the language Congress used in the statute before us. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix Chambers.
The appeals from the High Court of Justiciary (Scotland) concern warrants issued by the US District Court in Arizona for the extradition of the parents of six children on charges of conspiracy and importation into the United States of chemicals used to manufacture methamphetamine. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 2:27 am
Does the sale and use of AdWords infringe the rights of brand owners who have registered those words as trade marks in Europe? [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:50 am
Those rulings harkened back to Stevens' own role as a law clerk to Justice Wiley Rutledge in a 1948 post-World War II ruling Ahrens v Clark. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:45 am by Neil Wilkof
The court’s reasoning began with the well-known tripartite test for breach of confidence found in the English case of Coco v A N Clark (Engineers) Ltd [1969] RPC 41, namely (as paraphrased by the court in LVM) that:(a) “the information must possess the quality of confidentiality;(b) the information must have been imparted in circumstances importing an obligation of confidence; and (c) there must have been some unauthorised use of that information to the… [read post]