Search for: "US v. Jacobs"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,858
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2015, 10:22 am
The defendants urge us to adopt a more nuanced primary beneficiary test. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 9:00 am
In Merlin Partners LP v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 7:03 am
The Appellate Court of Illinois chimed in a few weeks ago, in Szafranski v. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 3:39 pm
Jacobs, C. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 7:37 am
UBS Financial Services, Inc., June 30, 2015, Jacobs, D.). [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 6:06 am
And in Michigan v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
Is this useful? [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Jacobs of Greenwire and Tony Mauro of the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required). [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:47 am
Kern, Judicial protection against torpedo actions In the recent case Weber v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Robert Jacob: Doubts about so-called experts. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Subject v. object: is TM law descriptive or normative? [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm
” In light of the Chief Justice Roberts's opinion in King v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am
A friendly reminder: We rely on our readers to send us links for the round-up. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
This Kat blogged last year about the masterful and erudite judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in the case of Actavis v Lilly (judgment on BAILII here), concerning pemetrexed. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:25 pm
Here the quoted cases were White v Samsung, Wendt v Host International and Douglas v Mattel. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
In Horne v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 10:46 am
This Kat, however, thinks that AG Wathelet is right and that, when he says"[The applicant] must prove that only the trade mark in respect of which registration is sought, as opposed to any other trade marks which may also be present, indicates, without any possibility of confusion, the exclusive origin of the goods or services at issue",he is vindicating the point made by Sir Robin Jacob about "limping marks" back in the 1990s in Philips Electonics NV v… [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
This is part two of a two-part interview with Ilya Somin about his new book, The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 7:30 am
They gave three reasons for their conclusion: No misuse of power Eclairs and Glengary sought to rely on the case of Howard Smith Ltd v Ampol Petroleum Ltd [1974] AC 821 where it was held that the board had used their power for an improper purpose. [read post]
