Search for: "US v. Lloyd" Results 941 - 960 of 1,158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2010, 3:10 am by Francis Davey
Unsurprisingly, in my view, in the light of Lord Justice Nichols famous dictum in Lloyds Bank Plc v Rosset [1989] 1 Ch 350 (a case with many similar features): "There was, I repeat, physical presence on the property by the wife and her agent of the nature, and to the extent, that one would expect of an occupier having regard to the then state of the property: namely, the presence involved in actually carrying out the renovation necessary to make the house fit for residential… [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:10 am by Francis Davey
Unsurprisingly, in my view, in the light of Lord Justice Nichols famous dictum in Lloyds Bank Plc v Rosset [1989] 1 Ch 350 (a case with many similar features): "There was, I repeat, physical presence on the property by the wife and her agent of the nature, and to the extent, that one would expect of an occupier having regard to the then state of the property: namely, the presence involved in actually carrying out the renovation necessary to make the house fit for residential… [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
US Law and Media News Once again, this will be the subject of a separate post. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 12:48 am by Mike
Lloyd found that the material was relevant because it could be used to calculate a royalty and that Mr. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 10:56 am
  As might be expected at this point, a familiar old chestnut from Catnic Components v Hill & Smith [1982] RPC 183 was wheeled out, by reference to the more recent case of Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Premium Aircraft Interiors UK Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1062. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 10:33 am by Sergio Leal
Courts typically side with insurance companies on this issue, but sometimes the facts of a case require courts to doubt this argument, just as the Texas Supreme Court did in State Farm Lloyds v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 7:16 am by Frank Pasquale
Lehmann describes the dubious reasoning behind the court’s 1886 fiat, in Santa Clara County v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:29 am
 While the list will close at midnight on 31 October, the IPKat can tell you that the five front-runners, in descending order, are Sabel v Puma, Canon, Baby-Dry, Lloyd and Silhouette. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
" Perhaps so.But that prompted our diligent researchers here at Abnormal Use to do a bit of cybersleuthing and investigation into the past of Mr. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 1:58 pm by Marty Schwimmer
Defendant sold its funeral home to plaintiff, now use the name LLOYD MANDEL MITZVAH MEMORIAL, which, plaintiff alleges, infringes the name it bought. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm by Anna Christensen
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, LondonDocket: 09-945Issue(s): Whether Chapter 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act is an “Act of Congress” subject to the anti-preemption provision of the McCarran-Ferguson Act.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (5th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's replySupplemental brief for petitioner Title: Hogan v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:19 am
The parties basically agreed, although used different routes to get there, that the dispute should be governed by English law.The judge found that, unlike the Ontario court, the English court was used to hearing reinsurance disputes and those involving Lloyd's specifically. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 3:00 am by VMaryAbraham
v=tZFbDY3-eG4 [Photo Credit: dsb nola] [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 7:05 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The case was decided by the Texas Supreme Court and is styled, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company and State Farm Lloyds v. [read post]