Search for: "United States ex rel. v. Exelis, Inc." Results 941 - 960 of 960
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(Spicy IP) Both Hindi cinema and theatre are accused of copyright infringement by relatives of dead authors (Spicy IP) Dispute between Bisleri and Coca-Cola over ‘Maaza’ trade mark ends up in Delhi High Court (Spicy IP) Geographical indications: the BASMATI wrangle (International Law Office) Foreign geographical indications enter India: (Spicy IP) Trade mark search essential to reveal deceptively similar trade marks (International Law Office) Outsourcing patent related… [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles)   Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:36 pm by Kenneth Vercammen
Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:13 am by Charles Johnson
(ETS), raised capital to grow his coin-operated payphone business by using a network of independent insurance agents to sell payphones to investors throughout the United States for $5,000 to $7,000 per phone. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:29 pm
The change in control or ownership solves ex ante contracting problems and ex post incentive problems. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 8:11 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
This is an important case for those of you who recently purchased a car to use in your business, BUT now find yourself needing to file bankruptcy.IN RE DENNIS & JESSICA HASKINSIn re: Dennis & Jessica Haskins, Chapter 13, Debtors.Case No. 09-10520.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm by admin
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm by Dianne Saxe
Fletcher (1866), L.R. 1 Ex. 265, aff’d (1868), L.R. 3 H.L. 330 for that loss. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]