Search for: "United States v. Minnesota"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,827
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2014, 6:42 am
Here is the opinion in State v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 1:28 pm
Bucci and Jews for Jesus v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 11:40 am
The subsequent class actions, on behalf of United States customers, were consolidated into the District of Minnesota. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 10:43 am
That ruling, Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:17 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:28 am
But as Target points out, Minnesota has recognized this “separate and distinct” special relationship doctrine, Domagala v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 8:09 am
(Dickerson v. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 2:44 pm
See United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 9:56 am
Marlon Quan, Acorn Capital Group, LLC and Stewardship Investment Advisors, LLCCase number: 11-cv-00723 (United States District Court for the District of Minnesota)Case filed: March 24, 2011Qualifying Judgment/Order: September 22, 2014 11/26/2014 02/24/2015 [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 3:09 pm
The Louisiana couples’ lawyers, in urging the Supreme Court to take on their case now along with any of those it accepted from the Sixth Circuit, made four points in favor of early review of the Louisiana case: First, the judge’s decision in favor of the ban was the first in the nation to uphold a state ban in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 11:30 am
Here is the abstract: In 1934, in the midst of the Depression, the United States Supreme Court, in Home Building & Loan Ass’n v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 3:00 am
Here's the abstract: Climate change litigation has influenced regulation substantially in the United States. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
United States, 320 U.S. 1, 60–61 (1943) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting in part) (‘‘it is an old observation that the training of Anglo–American judges ill fits them to discharge the duties cast upon them by patent legislation’’); Parke–Davis & Co. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:00 pm
Fund v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 7:44 pm
And United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
To construe “these four puzzling opinions that have few common aspects,” Tyree employed the analysis for such situations adopted by the United States Supreme Court in Marks v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 7:44 pm
By Matthew Skurnik Since the Supreme Court’s June 2013 ruling in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 6:54 am
See New York et al. v. [read post]
