Search for: "Unknown Does 1-10" Results 941 - 960 of 1,580
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
With respect to differential etiology, the same principle applies: the iterative disjunctive syllogism requires ruling out “unknown,” or at least minimizing the number of cases in the unknown disjunct that are not ruled out. [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:08 pm by Cicely Wilson
Does 1-1058, USDC (5/27/14)Civil Procedure, Copyright, Intellectual Property, Internet Law, Legal EthicsAF Holdings, represented by Prenda Law, filed suit in district court against 1,058 unnamed John Does who it alleged had illegally downloaded and shared the pornographic film “Popular Demand” using a file-sharing service known as BitTorrent. [read post]
15 May 2014, 3:33 pm by Kevin
According to police the entire incident started at 1:27 a.m. and ended when Sash was tased at 1:56, but he spent an unknown amount of time first hiding behind a tree and then refusing to comply with instructions (hence the tasing). [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:36 am by DMLP Staff
(against Does 1-10) Contributory Copyright Infringement [17 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:36 am by DMLP Staff
(against Does 1-10) Contributory Copyright Infringement [17 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:36 am by DMLP Staff
(against Does 1-10) Contributory Copyright Infringement [17 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 6:19 am by Rebecca Tushnet
It can be falsified by showing (1) that the defendant’s test or study was not sufficiently reliable to permit one to conclude with reasonable certainty that it establishes the proposition for which it was cited, or (2) that the test, while sufficiently reliable, does not establish the proposition claimed in defendant’s advertising. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 5:30 am by Renee Kolar
Strong, Does Class Arbitration “Change the Nature” of Arbitration? [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 7:55 pm
The trial court’s refusal to reopen its judgment, moreover, does not affect the application of claim preclusion. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 7:20 pm
See 496 U.S. at 163 n.10 (“[F]ees for fee litigation should be excluded [only] to the extent that the applicant ultimately fails to prevail in such litigation. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 1:35 pm by David Friedman
More precisely, “Perhaps the most inconvenient fact is the lack of global warming for well over 10 years now. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 8:58 am by Veronika Gaertner
The second part of the decision, that is concerning Art. 6(1), clarifies that a “close connection” between the claims exists if the defendant’s pleas have to be determined on a uniform basis and that the provision does not apply to defendants domiciled outside of the EU. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:29 am by Ana
Baranow, 2011 SCC 10, [2011] 1 S.C.R.269.Ontario continues to follow this equities-based approach. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:01 am by Nassiri Law
Often opposition to minimum wage increases stems from a fear of the unknown. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 11:00 am by aallwash
Occasionally, Congress does not pass a budget resolution. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 10:11 pm
” Id. at *3.Holdings[1] The language of the claims in this case does not contextually define “inert to light. [read post]