Search for: "*/**u.s. v. May"
Results 9581 - 9600
of 54,613
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2012, 2:22 pm
Roberts The U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:04 am
Romero v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 10:29 am
Roberts The U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 2:50 am
Since the U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:27 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 1:22 pm
See U.S. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 12:05 pm
United States v. $291,828.00 in United States Currency, 2008 U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 2:10 pm
See Segura v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 12:14 pm
Livingston v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 7:17 pm
” Pfaff,525 U.S. at 67–68; see also Weatherchem Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 6:17 am
Many of these clients may get their sentences reduced -- by a lot -- because of Johnson v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 9:16 pm
McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 10:52 am
Alvarez, 567 U.S. 709, 728 (2012) (quoting Abrams v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 12:42 pm
May 14: In the U.S. [read post]
8 May 2017, 7:43 am
Barron v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:37 pm
United States, 536 U.S. 545 (2002), will seldom create any significant risk of prejudice to the accused. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 12:20 pm
But I think the more direct answer is that merely because the executive branch, as it executes the laws, may have discretion to abate mandatory penalties doesn't mean that the judiciary has similar discretion. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 1:47 pm
Non-pedophiles may recognize the hypothetical from potentially analogous personal experiences; e.g., liking your best friend's girlfriend/boyfriend/spouse, etc.I'm not sure where I come out on the hypothetical. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 7:04 pm
But the unique procedural complexity in this case -- while arguably providing yet another basis for a grant of certiorari -- on balance may lead the Court to let the matter percolate one more time, and in a slightly more straightforward vehicle, before taking the matter up. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 6:22 am
" The judge also noted that if the defendants wanted to "pursue a broader challenge to this District's jury selection procedure, [they] may obtain the information needed to make such a challenge from publicly available sources. [read post]
