Search for: "Doe v. Doe" Results 9581 - 9600 of 137,455
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2020, 12:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The Petitioners:(1) Challenged as arbitrary and capricious the July 15, 2020, DOE's remote teaching policy for the 2020-2021 school year issued in response to the Covid-19 pandemic; and(2) Sought a court order compelling DOE to allow Petitioners “and all others similarly situated" to telework remotely on full salary or without loss of leave.Essentially Petitioners’ motion sought a temporary restraining order [TRO] prohibiting DOE from forcing… [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 12:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The Petitioners:(1) Challenged as arbitrary and capricious the July 15, 2020, DOE's remote teaching policy for the 2020-2021 school year issued in response to the Covid-19 pandemic; and(2) Sought a court order compelling DOE to allow Petitioners “and all others similarly situated" to telework remotely on full salary or without loss of leave.Essentially Petitioners’ motion sought a temporary restraining order [TRO] prohibiting DOE from forcing… [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Circuit Court of Appeals said in Segal v NYC Department of Education, 459 F3d 207, the placement of an individual’s name on the New York City Department of Education’s “Ineligible/Inquiry List” essentially render the individual ineligible for future employment with the New York City Department of Education [DOE].* In this Article 78 action Supreme Court denied a former tenured teacher’s [Teacher] petition seeking to, among other things, remove her name… [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 9:32 pm by Joseph Lazzarotti
Here, Doe (patient) sued Guthrie Clinic because one of the clinic's nurses (and sister-in-law of Doe's girlfriend) texted Doe's girlfriend about Doe's treatment for a sexually transmitted disease (STD). [read post]
28 Apr 2025, 12:37 pm
Maybe.But I doubt it.Four paragraphs. 367 words.Honestly, I'm not sure that you need say much more than the opinion does. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 7:00 am
Varriale New York Legal Update: Saving Provision of CPLR 205(a) Does Not Apply To A Different Related Corporate Entity (discusses recent NY Court of Appeals decision) New York Personal Injury Law Blog: A Personal Injury Law Rorschach Test: Bonaduce v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:46 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Subdivision three has been held to require an actually existing weapon (People v Pena, 50 NY2d 400 [1980]). [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:46 pm by Brian Shiffrin
That is the question considered by the the Court of Appeals in, People v Grant (_NY3d_ [10/20/11) at (see). [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 9:15 pm by Walter Olson
Tweet Tags: constitutional law, international law, Supreme CourtCourt decides Bond v. [read post]