Search for: "In re R. F."
Results 9581 - 9600
of 10,011
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2011, 1:08 pm
Recurso Extraordinário (RE) 460320 Relator: Min. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
The latest party to seek a slice of that action is the right-wing, Euroskeptic, anti-immigration Alternative für Deutschland (Alternative for Germany, or AfD). [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 5:30 am
La situación se ha agravado por otro desastre, los terremotos de gran intensidad y continuas réplicas en la zona suroeste del país, desde finales del año 2019. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
UPDATE ON NEESE VS. [read post]
25 Jul 2009, 5:54 pm
.; come sunrise, they're free to go. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 5:13 am
Pese al carácter unilateral de la propaganda desatada por el régimen en pro de la aprobación del referido cuerpo legal en referendo, esta ley recibió en definitiva la aprobación de menos de la mitad de los ciudadanos inscritos en el padrón electoral. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 12:35 am
Poulsen, 655 F.3d 492, 506 (6th Cir. 2011). [read post]
7 May 2015, 10:35 am
Edward Snowden’s biggest leak was that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court had interpreted Section 215 of the Patriot Act to authorize bulk collection of everyone’s phone records. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
An employer might say to an employee, “I have done everything I can to accommodate your religious needs, and now you’re just being a spoiled brat,” to which the employee might respond, “What you have done is single me out for ridicule among my secular co-workers. [read post]
4 Nov 2006, 5:15 am
F-22's or MV-22's? [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 8:28 am
And at the end, when Steve tells McCain, “I’m so sorry that I suggested her, ” McCain responds with, “Don’t be, F*ck ‘em, what were we supposed to do? [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
‘Now is the time to reassess presumption of parental involvement’, writes Lea Levine in the April issue of the journal[1]. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm
.; In re, 19 CBN 870 (Bankr. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
By William W. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 7:18 am
You’re shocked; eh? [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:23 am
Imagine you’re hiring a contractor to build a deck. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:37 pm
It doesn’t matter which of these interpretations you choose, however — the plaintiffs’ or the district court’s — they’re both difficult to squeeze into the language of the Act. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
The court did, however, hold that the receptor thresholds could be used under certain circumstances, consistent with the California Supreme Court’s ruling, such as: (1) when the effect is ‘exacerbated’ by the project; (2) when a lead agency wishes to use such information for its own evaluation purposes; and (3) for those certain projects specifically identified in CEQA that call for an analysis of impacts on future users (see airports (PRC § 21096), school construction… [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
§ 102(f) whereby a later filing invention could prove prior invention by showing that an earlier-filed invention should be invalid as it was stolen from the inventor of the later filed application. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:34 am
(b) The filing of a petition under section 301, 302, or 303 of this title, or of an application under section 5(a)(3) of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, does not operate as a stay—(1) under subsection (a) of this section, of the commencement or continuation of a criminal action or proceeding against the debtor;(2) under subsection (a)—(A) of the commencement or continuation of a civil action or proceeding—(i) for the establishment of paternity;(ii) for the… [read post]
