Search for: "Matter of Co" Results 9581 - 9600 of 39,665
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2013, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
On the retaliatory discharge claim, the court determined:  Unlike the situation in Fillinger where the LHWCA expressly precluded co-employee negligence actions while the Act permitted them, both the LHWCA and the Act prohibit a retaliatory discharge when an employee has sought benefits under the respective acts. [read post]
9 May 2013, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
Lockheed Missiles and Space Co., BRB No. 12-0410 (2013) (published). [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 6:00 am
  Join me and my co-hosts tonight at 8:30 PM ET for an open Q&A session. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 6:49 am by Karel Frielink
This matter was first decided in the cases of Poot v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co., the United States Supreme Court announced the test for determining admiralty jurisdiction over tort claims: A party seeking to invoke federal admiralty jurisdiction . . . over a tort claim must satisfy conditions of location and of connection with maritime activity. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 7:37 am by Steve Slick
The order was appropriately panned for including the Assistant to the President and Chief Strategist—a controversial campaign advisor—as a member of the NSC, for excluding the DNI and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from routine participation in PC meetings, and for elevating the fledgling HSC to co-equal status with the NSC. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:10 pm by Terry Hart
 That is, did the conduct actually cause the harm, and, if so, should the law as a matter of policy hold the actor liable for causing the harm? [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 8:00 am by Peter Margulies
(Full disclosure: I was co-counsel on an amicus brief by the Cato Institute; see here for Cato’s take on the decision, and here for the take of co-counsel Josh Blackman). [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 6:55 am
  Take Galston's co-congregants for an example. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 2:45 am
Each application, or any group co-pending of "indistinct applications" to one invention, is subject to 5/25 claims requirement.#2. [read post]
24 May 2010, 1:58 pm by WIMS
Chu said, "Finding a solution to this crisis is a matter of national importance. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:17 am
My thanks to Eugene Volokh for inviting me to guest-blog this week on The Volokh Conspiracy, in part to introduce my co-authored book, just published by Basic Books, entitled “The Constitution: An Introduction. [read post]