Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 9581 - 9600
of 13,837
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2009, 1:23 pm
Unlike Japan, Europe or even Russia, the United States has never passed legislation on GM crops. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 3:01 pm
The complaint alleges that the proposed respondent, Apple, Inc. of Cupertino, California (“Apple”), unlawfully imports into the U.S., sells for importation, and/or sells within the United States after importation certain electronic devices, including mobile phones, portable music players, and computers which allegedly infringe certain claims of U.S. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 2:15 pm
The complaint filed in California, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al. v. the Departments of Homeland Security and Labor, et al., challenges both the Strengthening Wage Protections for the Temporary and Permanent Employment of Certain Aliens in the United States Rule and the Strengthening of the H-1B Nonimmigrant Visa Classification Rule. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 10:33 am
Through well-established executive authority, the administration will temporarily spare youth educated in America’s schools from expulsion from the United States. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
Norquist states that his pledge is self-enforcing—”candidates and incumbents solemnly bind themselves”—but in a leading case cited in the Standler essay (above), Schaefer v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 4:00 pm
Athens Services then filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court, which denied the petition on January 11, 2010 (Athens Disposal Co., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:53 pm
” (Citing California Native Plant Society v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Lane; and (2) whether the United States Supreme Court has jurisdiction over a state court determination of retroactivity of a case on collateral review, when a state has both adopted and applied Teague. [read post]
2 May 2016, 11:26 am
In the United States, its products are sold under the brand name “TENA. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 10:36 am
United States, 16-7806. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:15 am
I would be remiss if I failed to mention the highlight of the week on the oral argument front: United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:01 am
California Coastal Commission (1987) and Dolan v. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 8:53 am
California, 403 U.S. 15, 25 (1971). [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
In 1977, in GTE Sylvania, the Courtheld that vertical customer and territorial restraints should be judged under the rule of reason.[17] In 1979, in BMI, it held that a blanket license issued by a clearinghouse of copyright owners that set a uniform price and prevented individual negotiation with licensees was a necessary precondition for the product and was thus subject to the rule of reason.[18] In 1984, in Jefferson Parish, the Court rejected automatic application of the per se rule to tying.[19]… [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 8:43 am
” The lawsuit is captioned United States and State of California ex rel. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:24 am
United States, 430 U.S. 188, 193, 97 S. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 8:40 am
The United States, as one of about 160 countries that signed the treaty, is obligated to notify foreign nationals who are arrested in the United States of their right to speak with their embassies. [read post]
19 May 2020, 1:52 pm
(rescheduled before the November 1, 2019, and November 8, 2019, conferences; relisted after the November 15, 2019, November 22, 2019, December 6, 2019, December 13, 2019, January 10, January 17, January 24, February 21, February 28, March 6, March 20, March 27, April 3, April 17, April 24, May 1 and May 15 conferences) United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 11:45 am
v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:03 am
Announcement (web page) and News Release (PDF) from United States District Court, Northern District of California. [read post]
