Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 9601 - 9620
of 48,948
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2008, 12:23 pm
Strawn v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 2:17 am
On 20 October 2021, the Supreme Court delivered its judgment in FS Cairo (Nile Plaza) LLC v Brownlie [2021] UKSC 45. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
ATKINSON, Plaintiff, : v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
ATKINSON, Plaintiff, : v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:41 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Klumb v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 10:39 am
In one, Doe v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 4:49 am
Corp. v Carter, 99 AD3d 692, 693 [2d Dept 2012] [noting that the statutory remedy is “designed . . . to deter” attorneys from “betraying” this obligation]). [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 4:14 pm
Reay v Beamont reminds us though that, where peculiar facts arise, the position is not so straightforward. 3. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:29 am
Hauck v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
Illegal downloaders get off scot free, as Copyright Tribunal process too expensive http://t.co/xKCzLc0UhK -> Nigeria's Biggest Copyright Infringement: MTN Nigeria Set To Face A Lawsuit http://t.co/7nY3zGT2Ro -> Massive Cyberattack Hits 10 Million Excellus Healthcare Customers http://t.co/SpyzAp8BvB -> Cyber-extortion racket revealed to be targeting UK financial institutions http://t.co/BATDeLcBRg -> Study: Cyberattacks could cost up to $90 trillion by 2030… [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 4:19 pm
The judgment again highlights the incredible costs to business of such actions by rogue employees. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:30 am
[1] Bartley v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 6:57 pm
Musta v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:43 am
" Employer (before yesterday's Supreme Court decision in Groff v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 10:13 am
Without a car, the time for travel doubled and the costs rocketed higher. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 11:22 pm
At that stage Burrell had already incurred over £28,000 in costs in these proceedings and estimated his further base costs to be £232,000 under a conditional fee agreement (a.k.a. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 7:09 am
Izquierdo v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:56 am
Case in point, a single Nokia v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:00 am
The State’s reduction of its employer contribution for health insurance premiums for judges was an unconstitutional diminution of judicial compensationBransten v State of New York, 2014 NY Slip Op 03214, Appellate Division, First DepartmentSitting and retired members of the New York State Judiciary challenged the State’s recent decrease in its employer contribution to the cost of the judges' health insurance premiums, contending that it violated the Compensation… [read post]
