Search for: "First Choice Security" Results 9601 - 9620 of 11,560
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2011, 9:49 am by Mehmet Munur
Google failed to live up to the Notice and Choice Principles of the Safe Harbor, with which it promised to comply. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 4:46 pm by Elie Mystal
Our first 0L has a very common problem:I am a current 0L getting ready to make my law school decision and have narrowed my choices down to two schools. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 1:30 pm by WIMS
And as we debate our national priorities and our budget in Congress, we're going to have to make some tough choices. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 11:39 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
The proposed settlement with Google marks the first time that the FTC will require a company to implement a comprehensive privacy program (as opposed to a comprehensive security program), with biennial audits for 20 years, and it contains the FTC’s first substantive privacy allegations regarding failure to comply with the U.S. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 11:06 am
Although presented as a sad inevitability, it is really a simple and stark choice. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 9:57 am by Natalie Hamill
The test will be whether these laudable intentions develop with real potential or break down at the first hurdle. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:21 pm by My name
” Congress’ intention was to open the market to a greater number of ratings agencies, increasing customer choice and incentivize accurate and reliable ratings. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:07 am by Jeremy Epstein
No one would (publicly) admit to the second goal today, so the first is always the declared purpose. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:23 am by Gritsforbreakfast
I've long thought that if there was a chance they'd close any prisons at all in the current budget crunch, it'd be the first one to go; locals have lots of good reasons to want it shut down. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 8:23 am by Stefan Bird-Pollan
The authors argue that Kant is the first to present us with “one single model designed to ensure peace on the national, international, and cosmopolitan levels. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 8:05 am by JB
Persian Kings needed a reliable system for sending information securely across vast distances. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 6:44 am by Gritsforbreakfast
"According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the total correctional population in the United States is declining for the first time in three decades. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 5:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
That’s a First Amendment freedom. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 5:04 am by David Udell
  In 1996, when the Gingrich Congress barred federally funded legal services lawyers from bringing class actions on behalf of the poor, I left Legal Services for the Elderly in order to finish a lawsuit on behalf of widows and widowers who were suing to compel the United States Treasury to fix its practices for replacing stolen Social Security payments. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 1:39 am by Eilionoir Flynn
The first of these was the judgement issued by the Second Section of the European Court of Human Rights in May 2010 on the case of Alajos Kiss v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 9:48 am by Dan
First off, as soon as possible, register whatever domains necessary to protect yourself. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Blum: there are technological answers to problems like security breaches. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:18 pm
My research assistant was unable to track down exactly how the warning about insolvency was included in the Social Security statements in the first place, but she did find that there have been many bills proposed to make the language sound even more pessimistic/catastrophic. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am by INFORRM
The default choice of law rule should not be the “lex loci delictii commissii” (the law of the place where the tort is committed) but rather, the lex loci protectionis (vindicatio)” (the law of the place where the protection is claimed or reputation vindicated). [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 9:14 pm by Jeff Gamso
The majority said that it didn't matter whether the guards were negligent, at least not in the first instance. [read post]