Search for: "Robert Reading"
Results 9601 - 9620
of 21,880
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2008, 9:32 am
Maybe it's just me, but I get more miles per gallon out of reading a blog post than an article. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:02 am
Continuing our coverage of Comstock, I just finished reading this effective editorial at The Atlantic raising some concerns over the potential reach of the decision. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 7:17 pm
Back with more after I've had a chance to read the decision.UPDATE: I've now read the decision, and the key bit is that the court rejected the fair use defense because, as Artnet's Walter Robinson puts it, "Prince's works do not specifically comment on Cariou's originals. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 8:37 am
Geoff’s post about Kevin Murphy’s recent slides and analytical framework for thinking about the stimulus are worth reading and if you haven’t yet. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 6:42 am
Our reading room contains legal treatises by subject, annotated codes, and a wide selection of federal and state legal material. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
Keep reading for more criminal law news. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:43 am
I have read Brian's posting on Sandra Day O'Connor, and the ensuing discussion, with great interest. [read post]
2 May 2010, 4:46 am
Robert Lowell’s Poems: A Selection. [read post]
18 May 2011, 6:47 am
You'll learn that Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. really doesn't like reading "which" in a brief, when "that" will do. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 2:06 pm
Read more… 2. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 1:00 am
Robert Blake. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 11:33 am
• Robert B. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 9:29 am
Chief Justice Roberts’ opinion relied heavily on Grutter v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
Still, the trajectory of the Roberts Court resists Tushnet’s narrative in interesting ways. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 1:47 pm
Breyer is going to read part of his dissent, and there is no confusion about that, as there was yesterday. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 9:16 pm
After talking to Totenberg and reading all justices' statements, I believe her reporting was solid, but her word choice was misleading. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 11:59 am
Roberts, Jr. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm
Consequently, one reading of the Chief Justice’s opinion is that a state could enact an abortion restriction with no actual health benefits and such a restriction would be constitutional so long as it does not impose a “substantial” burden on people’s ability to gain access to abortion. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 12:21 pm
According to The Daily Gazette, Sotomayor described her efforts at making her writing accessible to a wide audience: “Most people don’t read our decisions. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 12:46 pm
If so, they haven’t read much of what she’s written. [read post]
