Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 9621 - 9640
of 21,692
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2015, 4:36 am
Last week the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled in Clement et al v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 2:26 am
Lord Neuberger stated that the conclusion of the Court of Appeal in Ellis v Rowbotham [1900] 1 QB 740 that the 1870 Act did not apply to rent payable in advance, is correct. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 5:51 pm
Puerto Rico 2010) (Dismissing trademark dilution and infringement claims on the alleged word mark, thereby limiting the injunctive relief to a recently adopted trade dress) Watchtower Bible v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:25 pm
Not to be confused with another preemption decision, Funk v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 8:35 am
The Agreement granted Mission “exclusive distribution rights” in the United States and an opportunity to obtain similar rights in other countries. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 8:35 am
The Agreement granted Mission “exclusive distribution rights” in the United States and an opportunity to obtain similar rights in other countries. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
In American Humanist Association v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:48 am
The ImmigrationProf Blog is hosting an online symposium on United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
United States, 48 F. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:57 am
From In re D.M. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:11 am
Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal BoardTopics include:"tacking" - backward, forward; judge v. jury (Hana Financial, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 8:17 am
Stewart v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 7:07 am
A federal court in Virginia recently held in Travelers Casualty and Surety Company v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 73 [week ending on Sunday 22 November] – Xmas present from Benelux PTO | Eponia never ending troubles | Prof Dr Siegfried Broß v EPO | Protection of formats in the Netherlands | Eponia never ending proceedings | UK intensifies its Cracking Ideas programme | Anne Frank's Diary copyright | Transport for London and IP | CJEU in SBS Belgium v SABAM Case… [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:00 am
R (C) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 October 2015. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 3:57 am
Not only is this hardly a solution, but to suggest this red herring in the gray area of conflicted intent is to distract attention from the root problem of immunity as reflected in the nightmarish Supreme Court decision in Connick v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 10:38 am
New Hampshire Right to Life v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
The other stated:`The new public records request is for Mark Lindquist's cellular telephone records for number 253–861–[XXXX] for June 7, [2010]. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
The first of these cases is Mink v. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 5:18 am
Patent and Trademark Office, BETAMAX remains very much alive in the United States. [read post]
