Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 9621 - 9640
of 13,108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2014, 11:30 pm
Such disputes have risen all the way to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:22 am
In Charles v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 5:17 am
And in Edmond v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:36 am
" In Flynn, as in Bush v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 5:38 pm
The closest constitutional challenge to the PTAB was probably in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 12:38 pm
In General Motors Corp. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2015, 5:32 am
” He then explained how standing issues complicate the United States’ potential to accommodate European demands for judicial redress for data collection. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 8:58 am
EPA and West Virginia v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm
Lastly, Wilkinson argued that the fact that Al Qaeda declared war on the United States should be given little weight. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:21 pm
Supreme Court, January 21, 2010 Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 9:36 am
The petition in American Civil Liberties Union, et al., v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Albert Snyder v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 10:21 am
In that judgment in United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 10:21 am
He is being held by the United States military and has filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the impending transfer that will permit the Iraqis to carry out the sentence. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 6:02 am
The petition for certiorari in Kiyemba v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 10:01 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:53 am
Scope of arbitrating an alleged violation of a collective bargaining agreementRichfield Springs CSD v Allen, 270 AD2d 734Changes in health insurance benefits may be initiated by a third party that actually provides the benefit. [read post]
14 Aug 2021, 12:26 pm
Magseis FF LLC’s predecessor1 sued Seabed for patent infringement in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
In Matter of Karen P. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
