Search for: "State v. Waite" Results 9621 - 9640 of 10,815
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2015, 5:04 pm by Nate Russell
Very interesting cases like R v Nde Soh, 2014 NBQB 20, which deals with the distinction of “real” versus “documentary” electronic evidence under the Canada Evidence Act, or Fric v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 5:38 pm by Derek Bambauer
This looks bad for the state, but wait: we’re dealing with laws regulating intellectual property, and such laws draw intermediate scrutiny at most. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:02 am by Cordell Parvin
Some lawyers told me to just do good work, get a Martindale A-V rating and wait for the telephone to ring. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Colin Lachance
When you read R. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 10:35 am
Cast your mind back to last December and you might recall, though the midst of winter's murky memories, a bright and cheeky interlude in which the recently-promoted Mr Justice Kitchin starred, ITV Broadcasting Ltd and others v TV Catch Up Ltd [2010] EWHC 3063 (Ch). [read post]
7 May 2019, 7:14 pm by Helen Macpherson (AU)
However, we will have to wait to see whether Justice Robertson’s decision remains the final word on Rokt’s application, as the Commissioner of Patents has sought leave to appeal his Honour’s decision. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Bernard Clark
Although some states allow parents and children to sue for loss of consortium or “filial consortium,” a South Carolina Supreme Court case called Doe v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:41 am by Peter Mahler
But wait, you say, didn’t the LLC supersede the partnership and, if so, how can the LLC’s duration be governed by the termination date in the partnership agreement? [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 12:28 pm by jordan
Watkins states that, “A great deal of time and energy went into these updates. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 12:41 pm by San Antonio Lawyer
PUT THIS NUMBER INTO YOUR CELL PHONE RIGHT NOW: (210) 271-2800 (Megan V. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
The state's procedural shenanigans work, and you'll have to wait to be sued before you can vindicate your First Amendment rights. [read post]