Search for: "United States v. May" Results 9621 - 9640 of 47,771
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am by Amy Howe
United States, the Facebook threats case, continues. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 2:22 pm by Ilya Somin
The first was that sanctuaries beat the administration at the Supreme Court in June of that year; technically, the justices declined to hear United States v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:25 am by Heidi Henson
The NLRB lacked a quorum of board members when it published its rule amending its representation election procedures on December 16, 2011, and the challenged rule is therefore invalid, the District of Columbia federal district court held, in a perhaps tepid — and temporary — victory for opponents of what has been dubbed the board’s “quickie” or “ambush” election rule (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v NLRB, May… [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:39 pm
§ 227 Unsolicited Advertisement     Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:35 am
The New York Times’ Adam Liptak covers United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 7:53 am by John McFarland
The Texas Supreme Court denied the landowners’ motion for rehearing last Friday in Murphy v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 11:35 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
A design patent is at issue:Coleman owns United States Design PatentNo. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:44 am by Eric Goldman
  (A “United States work” is a work first published in the United States, or simultaneously published in the United States and any foreign country; or an unpublished work (or a work first published in a nation with whom the United States does not have a copyright treaty) for which all authors are citizens of or domiciled in the United States. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 10:42 am by Mavrick Law Firm
”  A recent case from the United States Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that a trade name can be “distinct” when it incorporates two generic terms which are not typically linked together. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 4:53 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the jury's deliberations or to the... [read post]