Search for: "Light v. United States"
Results 9641 - 9660
of 11,342
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2022, 5:44 am
Theoretically, there is always the possibility of a detailed ruling stating hard facts or providing useful explanations in light of which an unconvincing short-form decision all of a sudden makes sense. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 6:25 am
The court rules that patent law is lex specialis.Not being an expert on Indian conflicts of law and jurisdiction/competence matters, I would not delve in the correctness of this decision (but the IPKat’s much learned readers are invited to illustrate me in the comments).Yet, the practical consequences of addressing it as conflict of competences matter, differ substantially than those of affirming that sections 3 and 4 of the Competition Act are not applicable to the cases linked to the… [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 7:52 am
A number of states have changed their legislation to include this exception to the double jeopardy rule, including Ireland, Denmark, Germany, and of course the United Kingdom. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Robbins, and Kisor v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 1:20 pm
Mayer Brown Associate Makes Debut Before Supreme Court [Appellate.net (linkwrap)] Earlier: Mayer Brown Associate Makes His Supreme Court Debut Jenner & Block Associate Argues Her First Case - In the Supreme Court Update: Jenner & Block Associate Scores SCOTUS Win Supreme Court of the United States - Supreme Court - United States - Government - Judicial Branch [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Donell v. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 8:49 pm
In United Steelworkers Local 2251 v Algoma Steel Inc., in an arbitration of a dual Canadian-American citizen working in Canada, but living on the American border. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:40 pm
On Nov. 17, 2016, TPS revised their policies in light of these regulations. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm
In Department of Commerce v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:03 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 4:42 pm
In Kitzmiller v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:03 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:37 am
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 1:07 am
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm
In a nutshell, the question in TC Heartland v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:13 am
A trial court’s duty to insure that a defendant understands the consequences of a guilty plea before he enters one extends only to direct consequences of such a plea.In addition, the United States Supreme Court, in Iowa v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 pm
While the Privacy and Electronic Communications Directive regulated the behaviour of communications providers generally, Article 1(3) of that Directive specifies that matters covered by Titles V and VI of the TEU at that time (e.g. public security, defence, State security) fall outside the scope of the directive, which the Court described as relating to “activities of the State” . [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 11:54 am
Recall that Section 5 provided as follows: "No person may invoke the Geneva Conventions or any protocols thereto in any habeas corpus or other civil action or proceeding to which the United States, or a current or former officer, employee, member of the Armed Forces, or other agent of the United States is a party as a source of rights in any court of the United States or its States or territories. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 10:20 am
Recall that Section 5 provided as follows: "No person may invoke the Geneva Conventions or any protocols thereto in any habeas corpus or other civil action or proceeding to which the United States, or a current or former officer, employee, member of the Armed Forces, or other agent of the United States is a party as a source of rights in any court of the United States or its States or territories. [read post]
