Search for: "ROBERT COMES" Results 9641 - 9660 of 21,762
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2015, 2:29 pm by Mark Walsh
The monthly calendar has turned to June, and with twenty-five merits decisions left going into today, the end of the term is coming into focus. [read post]
31 May 2015, 1:02 am by rhapsodyinbooks
While this is by no means a hagiography, one comes away with an enormously positive view of Napoleon at the end, or at least, I did. [read post]
30 May 2015, 5:01 am by Bill
As Robert Christgau said in his review of Frankie Goes to Hollywood (remember them?) [read post]
29 May 2015, 1:11 pm by Martin Miller
Justice Scalia, in a strongly worded dissent (in which Chief Justice Roberts joined), disagreed. [read post]
29 May 2015, 8:47 am
Simon Roberts, who is organising the London course, tells IPKat readers that the Basic course is nearly full, but that there are about 10 more places left available on the advanced course. [read post]
28 May 2015, 9:00 am by Amy Howe
Garza, No. 90-849” – in a brief signed by then-Deputy Solicitor General John Roberts. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:38 am by Bob Eisenbach
. *     *     * Because Stern was premised on non-consent to adjudication by the Bankruptcy Court, the ‘constitutional bar’ it announced, see post, at 14 (ROBERTS, C. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:38 am by Bob Eisenbach
. *     *     * Because Stern was premised on non-consent to adjudication by the Bankruptcy Court, the ‘constitutional bar’ it announced, see post, at 14 (ROBERTS, C. [read post]
27 May 2015, 1:58 pm by Art Hinshaw
This dispatch comes from FOI Alyson Carrel (Northwestern). [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:27 am by Ronald Mann
Six Justices (all but Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas) agreed with the discussion summarized above. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:27 pm by Joey Fishkin
 But like so much in contemporary constitutional litigation in the era of John Roberts and Ed Blum, the Evenwel case comes at the law in a kind of funhouse-mirror reverse, aiming to destroy in Equal Protection’s name a substantial chunk of what that clause has built. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The Notion of Cross-Border Tax Disadvantage (Warning: This Turns Out To Be a Red Herring) By now, we have come to expect that 5-4 decisions from the Supreme Court will find Justice Kennedy siding with either Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, or with Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:02 pm by Ron Coleman
and he explains it all: Q: So if Richard Roeper or his new semipermanent guest host, Robert Wilonsky, flashes a thumbs-up sign, Ebert could sue him? [read post]
26 May 2015, 12:28 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Several district courts have considered this question and come to the same conclusion.[]We now hold that evidence of an accused inducer’s good-faith belief of invalidity may negate the requisite intent for induced infringement. *** Reuters noted on 26 May 2015:The high court ruled in an opinion by Justice Anthony Kennedy that Cisco's belief that the patent was valid [sic: ?. [read post]
25 May 2015, 2:05 am by Robert May
Robert May and the other attorneys at the May Firm are exceptionally skilled in the courtroom. [read post]