Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 9641 - 9660
of 21,158
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Jones, Lemle v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 12:29 pm
Ropes & Gray LLP v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:58 pm
In addition, the structure of the agreements between Ingenico and VeriFone, the only two significant POS sellers in the United States post-merger, enhances VeriFone and Ingenico’s ability to coordinate pricing for all POS terminals.The complaint is U.S. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 11:46 pm
E.g., Sullivan v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 3:12 pm
Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 12:32 pm
Perry v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 1:07 am
Mandalia v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7 May 2015. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 4:43 pm
Last summer, Dobbs v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:56 am
Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 829 F.2d 1233 (3d Cir. 1987). [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 1:29 pm
Thomas James (“The Cokato Copyright Attorney”) explains how Hachette Book Group et al. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 1:29 pm
Thomas James (“The Cokato Copyright Attorney”) explains how Hachette Book Group et al. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
The August 21, 2013 decision of the Appellate Division, Second Department in Patete v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 5:46 am
” In Coffman v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 2:39 pm
’” In addition, the district court transferred the pig iron sale proceeds to the state court. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 5:47 pm
JONES, Appellant, v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 12:09 pm
Automatic weapons are generally not importable into the United States for sale to citizens. (18 U.S. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 4:44 pm
Stroh & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm
Michael Geist has addressed the issue of digital tax, including digital sales taxes, “Netflix taxes” (on-demand media services taxes) and taxes upon internet access. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
We, of course think that's wrong under Erie - where the default should be, if a form of liability hasn't been recognized by a state court, then it should be dismissed by a federal court applying that state's law in a diversity action.ConnecticutIn Gerrity v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 12:10 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKBusiness Law'Safe Harbor' Exception to Disgorgement Applies To 'Short-Swing' Profits From Shares' Sale Feder v. [read post]
