Search for: "P. T.2"
Results 9661 - 9680
of 14,913
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2011, 8:06 pm
’” (p. 43) I find that exchange unhelpful. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 2:05 pm
Under the case law, "shall" can mean "may" when (1) it obviously doesn't mean "must" in the context of the statute's purpose;(2) reading it as "must" would lead to unjust consequences; or(3) reading it as "may" doesn't harm any public or private advantage, right, or benefit.In State v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 1:47 pm
Cheshire West and Chester Council v P [2011] EWCA Civ 1257. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 12:29 pm
See, e.g., Stephen T. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 11:55 am
For I don’t know how many years Mr. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
Nada que decir. 2º Se trata de un puesto de Subdirector/a General del Departamento de Coordinación Jurídica y Relaciones Internacionales. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 11:45 am
However, he does not attempt a detailed rebuttal, because Politico wouldn’t let him post his own full op-ed, and limited him to a short letter. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 3:33 pm
” The three Justices would thus have held that Danforth should be committed, pursuant to his stipulation.2. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm
Don’t underestimate the amount of time and effort that is required for this, and don’t assume that a judge will accept some kind of rough, back of the envelope calculation. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 8:34 am
If Congress decides to exercise its power to direct sentencing policy by enacting mandatory minimum penalties, the Commission believes that such penalties should (1) not be excessively severe, (2) be narrowly tailored to apply only to those offenders who warrant such punishment, and (3) be applied consistently. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 7:55 am
In other words, if you had nothing to hide, why didn't you take the test? [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:50 pm
Supp.2d ___, 2010 WL 7801786, at *2 (N.D. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:00 am
As set forth in Table 2, happy negotiators concede more, are offered less, and do worse individually. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
In Say v Smith (1563) Plowd 269, 272, Anthony Brown J said that “every contract sufficient to make a lease for years ought to have certainty in three limitations, viz in the commencement of the term, in the continuance of it, and in the end of it … and words in a lease, which don’t make this appear, are but babble.”25. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
In Say v Smith (1563) Plowd 269, 272, Anthony Brown J said that “every contract sufficient to make a lease for years ought to have certainty in three limitations, viz in the commencement of the term, in the continuance of it, and in the end of it … and words in a lease, which don’t make this appear, are but babble.”25. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:36 pm
Those numbers don’t look very pleasant. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:11 pm
Sustenta, em síntese, que: 1) os parágrafos 1º e 2º do artigo 99 ofendem o princípio da reserva de lei complementar e incorrem em vício de iniciativa ao conferir ao governador do Estado a iniciativa do processo de destituição do procurador-geral de Justiça; 2) que o artigo 99, caput, da Constituição Estadual não limitou o número de reconduções ao cargo de procurador-geral de… [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:40 pm
P. 60(b)”); United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 10:55 am
P. 2-3. [read post]
