Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 9661 - 9680
of 13,837
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2013, 6:00 am
John Marsh, Russell Beck, and I just recorded another episode of the Fairly Competing podcast (which will be available Tuesday morning), and we discussed the latest chapter in United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 2:41 am
Between 1 AM and 2 AM local time on Sunday, Samsung's counsel in the intellectual property dispute with Apple notified the court of a "final" Office action by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejecting all claims of Apple's pinch-to-zoom API patent, U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 11:12 pm
The Apple v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 12:37 pm
United States is relevant. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 2:16 pm
See United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 8:00 am
See also Saucier v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 2:25 am
Just like one of the world's most famous FRAND judges, United States District Judge James L. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 5:17 am
That standard worked for a while, but with the development of new technology, it has become very difficultThe first case was “United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 1:30 am
Per the decision in Barnes v Yahoo! [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:45 am
” United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 10:48 am
This framing results in Google being ordered to remove speech under Canadian law even if no court in the United States could issue a similar order. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 11:31 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:12 pm
Apple and Apple v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 8:28 am
Patent No.7,789,110 (“the ’110 patent”), SSI appeals several pre- andpost-judgment orders from the United States DistrictCourt for the Northern District of California. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 6:16 am
Bank, University of California, Los Angeles, on Thursday, August 18, 2016 Tags: Boards of Directors, Compensation guidelines, Compensation ratios, Corporate culture, Executive Compensation,Labor markets, Management, Taxation Political Contributions and Lobbying Proposals Posted by Yafit Cohn, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Thursday, August 18, 2016 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:58 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Byrnie v Town of Cromwell Board of Education, 243 F3d 93 [2001], explained that spoliation sanctions serve three purposes: (1) deterring parties from destroying evidence; (2) placing the risk of an erroneous evaluation of the content of the destroyed evidence on the party responsible for its destruction; and (3) restoring the party harmed by the loss of evidence helpful to its case to where the party would have… [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 12:19 pm
It also defies Rule 36-2(f), which calls for published opinions “following a reversal or remand by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 7:09 am
The issue in NFL v. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 11:31 am
Chapter V of GDPR governs the legality of transfers of personal data to third countries and allows for the transfer of data to a third country when the EC decides that “a third country...ensures an adequate level of protection” or when there are appropriate safeguards in place. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 6:48 am
U.S. v. [read post]
