Search for: "Supreme Court of Florida" Results 9661 - 9680 of 18,491
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
  As noted above, Dixon relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Arizona v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 4:19 pm by Jacek Stramski
On December 19, 2013, the Florida Supreme Court fulfilled its constitutional duty under Article V, section 9 of the Florida Constitution, and issued its determination regarding the need for additional judges. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:00 am by Karen Tani
  "Brandeis, Gitlow, and the Supreme Court’s Transformation During the Interwar Years," by William G. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:48 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The tribe was a party to the Supreme Court decision in 1996 that radically altered the bargaining power between tribes and states over the negotiation and regulation of casino-style gaming under IGRA. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 1:12 pm by By Dara Lind
Arizona spent $1.5 million just to defend SB 1070 against court challenges—and that's before the case went to the Supreme Court (where much of the law was struck down). [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 12:51 pm by Stephen Bilkis
However, on the same day the Supreme Court reversed another State court decision under the Florida obscenity statute in Tralins v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 5:14 am
The California Supreme Court held Torti liable for the injuries suffered by Van Horn when Torti yanked her from the car “like a rag doll. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Objecting residents and the Rhode Island affiliate of the ACLU sued and the 1984 Supreme Court ruling in Lynch v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 12:14 pm by Juan Antúnez
“Thus, there is no reasonable basis to conclude that the trigger for priority is anything but the exercise of jurisdiction as was stated by the supreme court in Siegel. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:07 am by Wystan Ackerman
In other cases, the class action may be premised on a new state supreme court decision. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am by Marty Lederman
  Moreover, with respect to that one of the two options a RFRA claim is virtually foreclosed by the Court’s unanimous 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:35 am by Eric P. Robinson
Several state appeals courts (such as the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, the California Supreme Court, the Florida Supreme Court, the Michigan Supreme Court, and the New York Court of Appeals) already offer online video of their proceedings. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:35 am by Eric P. Robinson
Several state appeals courts (such as the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, the California Supreme Court, the Florida Supreme Court, the Michigan Supreme Court, and the New York Court of Appeals) already offer online video of their proceedings. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 2:16 pm
In Gardner v Florida, it was held that even though sentencing is a critical stage of a criminal proceeding, the full panoply of constitutional rights is not applied to the sentencing process. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 1:02 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Litigation in select counties started additional recounts, and this litigation ultimately reached the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 12:43 pm by Michael Lowe
Supreme Court held that the Florida Supreme Court was wrong to hold that state prosecutors had to establish the reliability of a “scent hound” by admitting the drug dog’s field performance log. [read post]