Search for: "Doe 3" Results 9681 - 9700 of 193,174
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2011, 10:16 am
According to a Gallup poll, 47% of American adults report having a gun in their home, up 2 or 3% from back in 1993. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 9:52 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
This very strict rule, called contributory negligence, is rare among states, but Maryland does strongly adhere to the doctrine. [read post]
25 May 2020, 7:37 am by Howard Friedman
The majority, in a brief opinion, said in part:Where state action does not “infringe upon or restrict practices because of their religious motivation” and does not “in a selective manner impose burdens only on conduct motivated by religious belief,” it does not violate the First Amendment. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Conclusion, Norman Doe and Stephen Coleman (Cardiff University, UK) [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 11:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Servs. 3 NY3d 498, indicated that dismissals based of the lack of "credentials required for [the] job" clearly were not disciplinary actions and “the [Lanterman plaintiffs'] assertion that they were does not have a relationship with their collective bargaining agreement sufficient to justify arbitration of the issue. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 11:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Servs. 3 NY3d 498, indicated that dismissals based of the lack of "credentials required for [the] job" clearly were not disciplinary actions and “the [Lanterman plaintiffs'] assertion that they were does not have a relationship with their collective bargaining agreement sufficient to justify arbitration of the issue. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:26 pm by Gene Takagi
What does it mean to have a religious purpose? [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 9:54 pm
The affidavit said Rogers works at a hospital in Atlanta, but didn't say which one or what kind of job he does. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 12:02 pm
"It is well settled in this circuit that the doctrine of speciality limits only the charges on which an extradited defendant can be tried; it does not affect the scope of proof admissible at trial for the charges for which extradition was granted and it does not alter the forum country's evidentiary rules. [read post]
22 Aug 2009, 10:00 pm
My August 17th "Asset Search News Roundup" referred to the settlement of the case over the "John Doe" summons served on UBS in Miami. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 4:15 am
Union's right to demand and obtain documents on file with the employer in a grievance procedure does not extend to disciplinary actionsMatter of Pfau v Public Empl. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:16 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Because SORA does not define "conviction," the court in Matter of Smith found it appropriate to look to CPL 1.20 (13), which provides that conviction includes “the entry of a plea of guilty” to an accusatory instrument, does not recognize nolo contendere pleas as was also held in People v Daiboch. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 2:11 pm by Jon Hyman
The change comes in the form of Wage & Hour Division Administrator’s Interpretation No. 2010-3. [read post]
22 May 2011, 11:20 pm by David Hart QC
Oddly, Art.10(a) of the EIA Directive does not get a mention in the judgement. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 1:26 pm
Nevertheless, there are times where the statute of frauds defense does not apply and you don't need the writing to prove that a contract does exists. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 9:51 pm
Does Section 2(a) [of the Lanham Act] fully satisfy the United States' international obligations under TRIPs? [read post]