Search for: "Downs v State"
Results 9681 - 9700
of 40,863
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2008, 9:04 pm
This symposium essay attempts to remedy that defect, analyzing Pressley in light of the precedent upon which it relied (the Court's 1952 decision in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:53 am
First this: On Tuesday, in State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:35 am
Last year, in State v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 12:04 pm
The United States Attorney’s Office also stated that it planned to 'use the video of the [en banc] argument as a training tool to reinforce the principle that all Assistant U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 7:24 am
In Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 12:23 pm
Justice Kagan also noted the similarity between this case and United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am
The Cowboys are down thirty at halftime. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:40 am
Caifornia and United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:09 am
On 24 September 2019, whilst the country was focused on the United Kingdom Supreme Court as it ruled that the prorogation of the UK parliament was unlawful, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU or ECJ), handed down judgment in Google LLC, successor in law to Google Inc. v Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés (CNIL), C‑507/17, effectively a sequel to the landmark data protection ‘Google Spain’ decision… [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:49 am
This is worth noting as it seems to flow from the Supreme Court's ruling in Chaoulli v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:38 pm
No arguments were heard and the decision boils down to: “The question presented in this case is whether the holding of Citizens United applies to the Montana state law. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:38 pm
No arguments were heard and the decision boils down to: “The question presented in this case is whether the holding of Citizens United applies to the Montana state law. [read post]
29 May 2012, 3:46 am
Down in Columbus, the big case was State v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:15 pm
ConAgra Foods points to the Court’s 1990 decision in Carden v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 8:03 pm
Entry 50 of List II does not constitute an exception to the position of law laid down in M P V Sundararamier (supra). [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 4:04 pm
(See Members of the City Council v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 3:40 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:30 pm
Texas, United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
