Search for: "Grant v. State" Results 9681 - 9700 of 68,532
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2014, 11:17 am by Editorial Board
Judge Sam Sparks of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas granted judgment to defendants in two related cases filed by the FDIC on behalf Guaranty Bank (now defunct) arising out of Guaranty Bank’s purchases in 2004 and 2005 of US$2.1 billion in RMBS. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:45 am by Paul Rugani
On March 24, Judge Laura Taylor Swain of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss an action filed by the FDIC, as receiver for two failed banks, related to RMBS certificates that the banks purchased. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 12:44 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Coleman v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:42 am by Hutko
In our submission, we address:  (i) the importance of the decision and task of the Court,  (ii) the reasons why the states should be held accountable for collateral over-blocking of the websites by private parties,  (iii) importance of specific legal basis as to the target and means of blocking,  (iv) the need to observe the principle of proportionality in grant and implementation of website blocking and  (v) available remedies against the abuse… [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:44 am
We know from the state post-conviction court that the State’s “proof of guilt [at that trial] was not a slam dunk by any stretch of the imagination. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 2:19 am
Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Title II claims for monetary and equitable relief against Defendant for failure to state a claim should be granted. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The State applied to or Courts of that State shall decide whether the crime or offense is of a political character or not. [read post]
19 May 2017, 9:56 am
We grant Clark’s motion to dismiss the appeal because it is frivolous. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 1:59 pm
  And the Court -- weary of being perceived as coddling child molesters -- makes clear that it's just saying that the trial court shouldn't have granted a demurrer, and instead should take evidence about whether the statute indeed constitutionally advances a legitimate state interest as applied to that group of patients.Nonetheless, as a practical matter, at least while the lawsuit's pending -- which practically means, for years -- unless you want to be turned… [read post]