Search for: "Level v. State" Results 9681 - 9700 of 29,841
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2018, 10:36 am by Timothy Edgar
  The closest analogy for Mueller’s decision to charge the Russian trolls is probably the May 2014 indictment in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 4:36 am by William Ford
William Ford posted the Fourth Circuit’s ruling against President Trump’s travel ban in IRAP v. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 3:45 am by Nate Nead
As stated above, understanding and calculating the velocity in any token economy is a critical factor in assessing long term sustainability and risk of any given token project. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Peter Margulies
§1182(a)(9)(B)(v), Congress precluded judicial review of decisions by the attorney general to waive (or refuse to waive) a restriction on the admission of foreign nationals who had accrued periods of unlawful presence in the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Peter Margulies
§1182(a)(9)(B)(v), Congress precluded judicial review of decisions by the attorney general to waive (or refuse to waive) a restriction on the admission of foreign nationals who had accrued periods of unlawful presence in the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Peter Margulies
§1182(a)(9)(B)(v), Congress precluded judicial review of decisions by the attorney general to waive (or refuse to waive) a restriction on the admission of foreign nationals who had accrued periods of unlawful presence in the United States. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 8:27 am
 The 2018 Research Forum addresses challenges to the international legal order emanating from dynamics of disengagement from multilateral governance, a perceived erosion of support by states and other stakeholders in existing international institutions, contestation of universal values, shifts in hegemonic power at the global and regional level, and the rise in populist, antiliberal, anti-institutional and isolationist political sentiments in various regions of the… [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 8:13 am by William Morriss
Early on, the patent office’s July 2015 subject matter eligibility update responded to concerns about whether examiners were properly making out a prima facie case of ineligibility by stating that patent eligibility was a question of law, and that no facts were necessary to make out a prima facie case.2 The MPEP has also been amended to reflect this view,3 and the superfluity of facts to eligibility appears to be a foundational assumption for the application of section 101 during… [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
The spotlight stays on the high-profile union-fees case that will be argued this month, Janus v. [read post]