Search for: "Mays v. State" Results 9681 - 9700 of 119,555
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2013, 1:46 pm by Anup Surendranath
The judgment of the Supreme Court on 10th July in CEC v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:44 pm
Nor may he collect life insurance on the life of the person he has killed. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am by Emma Cross, Olswang LLP
If a court is satisfied that a provision of primary legislation is incompatible with a Convention right, it may make a declaration of that incompatibility (s. 4(2)) although such a declaration does not affect the validity, continuing operation or enforcement of the provision in question and is not binding on the parties (s. 4(6)). [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 12:03 am
In KSR, the Supreme Court stated that even if a claimed invention passes the TSM test, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) may still reject a patent claim using things such as "common sense. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:01 pm
                 While plaintiffs may have managed to sneak a few claims through in Angeles v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Since the Supreme Court has observed, first in the seminal case of Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. [read post]
12 May 2013, 8:00 am by Howard Friedman
United States Department of Justice, 2013 U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:11 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
These Regulations enable civil proceedings in UK courts for breaches of the EC Regulations, and state that compensation awarded may include sums for injury to feelings. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 7:29 am
Denial of medical care under color of state law may state a claim for wrongful death or personal injuries under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
31 May 2008, 8:11 pm
Texas, in which the Court ruled that states may not use criminal law to penalize consensual adult private homosexual conduct. [read post]
The outcome of this litigation may push the Washington legislature to act once again on this issue to protect consumers. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:36 am
More detailed consideration may follow in due course.IPKat readers who have followed this saga will know that earlier this year Mr Justice Arnold gave the first detailed consideration of what a Swiss-form claim means, see blog post here and here. [read post]