Search for: "State v. Downs" Results 9681 - 9700 of 40,855
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2011, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
  Last year, in State v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 12:04 pm
 The United States Attorney’s Office also stated that it planned to 'use the video of the [en banc] argument as a training tool to reinforce the principle that all Assistant U.S. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am by John Elwood
The Cowboys are down thirty at halftime. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:40 am by SHG
Caifornia and United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:09 am by INFORRM
On 24 September 2019, whilst the country was focused on the United Kingdom Supreme Court as it ruled that the prorogation of the UK parliament was unlawful, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU or ECJ), handed down judgment in Google LLC, successor in law to Google Inc. v Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés (CNIL), C‑507/17, effectively a sequel to the landmark data protection ‘Google Spain’ decision… [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:49 am by Christopher Bird
This is worth noting as it seems to flow from the Supreme Court's ruling in Chaoulli v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:38 pm by Steven Berk
No arguments were heard and the decision boils down to: “The question presented in this case is whether the holding of Citizens United applies to the Montana state law. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:38 pm by Steven Berk
No arguments were heard and the decision boils down to: “The question presented in this case is whether the holding of Citizens United applies to the Montana state law. [read post]
29 May 2012, 3:46 am by Russ Bensing
Down in Columbus, the big case was State v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 8:03 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Entry 50 of List II does not constitute an exception to the position of law laid down in M P V Sundararamier (supra). [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am by Blog Editorial
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
  Here, much to our liking, the court cited the recent Tenth Circuit ruling in Caplinger v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 9:17 am by Neumann Law Group
Specifically, he claimed that the issue was controlled by the Connecticut Supreme Court’s decision in Levandoski v. [read post]