Search for: "Petite v. United States" Results 9701 - 9720 of 13,108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2008, 9:33 pm
If we learn of any reported CCA decisions, we'll post links and synopses.This week at the trial level: We understand that military commission proceedings will occur at Guantanamo this week in the case of United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:47 am by Lyle Denniston
” The Supreme Court’s 2008 ruling in Boumediene v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Oklahoma state law provides that “if a vacancy or irrevocable resignation occurs in the office of a member of the United States Senate from Oklahoma” the state must hold a special election to fill the empty or to-be-empty seat. [read post]
15 May 2009, 12:30 pm
    Proposition 65, as interpreted by the Court of Appeal in AFL-CIO v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:46 am by Nabiha Syed
” And finally, in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 4:10 am
” §2.8 of the Retirement and Social Security Law defines the term “employer” as “The state, a participating employer, and any other unit of government or organization obligated or agreeing, under this article, to make contributions to the retirement system on behalf of its employees. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-402, and (apparently) Jordan v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:42 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
The dissent begins with a flourish: In these proceedings, the government accepts as fact that the United States has reached a tipping point crying out for a concerted response—yet presses ahead toward calamity. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:08 am by John Elwood
United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:20 am by Amy Howe
United States, a petition scheduled for the Court’s September 29 Conference. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court of the United States recently granted a petition for certiorari in Kindred Nursing Centers Limited Partnership v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:44 am by Nabiha Syed
  In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Michael McGough examines United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:58 am by Thomas B. Griffith
United States Customs and Border Protection, No. 22-5071, asks whether an “Officer of the United States,” rather than an employee, must issue a removal order. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
The first was United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 7:21 am
Naythons was the arbitrator in the state proceeding, not a party to the action, and the fact that he was named as a respondent in one of the state court petitions is of no import. [read post]