Search for: "Unit, Inc., Appeal of" Results 9701 - 9720 of 13,898
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2011, 8:36 am by Ronald F. Wick
Two of the plaintiffs appealed a determination by the district court that they failed Rule 23(a)’s typicality requirement. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 1:47 pm by WIMS
This sounds superficially appealing, but there is a fundamental flaw in their logic. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 1:45 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 9:12 am
The public policy defense is available under the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration, which the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals had previously recognized in the decision in Thomas v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 2:42 pm
Moreover, a trial had just begun in the Justice Department’s action to halt H&R Block Inc. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:49 am
"Plaintiff Lost at Seaman Claim" Robert Teaver may have fancied himself a man of the sea but the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit agreed with the District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana that there was no way he could establish his status as a "seaman" for purposes of the Jones Act. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:48 am by Tony McClure
United Foundries, Inc., determining that Gulf Underwriters Insurance Company did not have a duty to defend United Foundries, Inc. under such a stop-gap endorsement in an employer intentional tort action.In the policy, the stop gap endorsement contained standard language for intentional injuries: This insurance does not apply to: e. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:48 am by Tony McClure
United Foundries, Inc., determining that Gulf Underwriters Insurance Company did not have a duty to defend United Foundries, Inc. under such a stop-gap endorsement in an employer intentional tort action.In the policy, the stop gap endorsement contained standard language for intentional injuries: This insurance does not apply to: e. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:28 am by John L. Welch
ISM, Inc., 94 USPQ2d 1111 (TTAB 2010) [precedential] (foreign owner without use of its mark in the United States may bring a claim for dilution based on the fame of its mark here, provided that it has filed an application to register the mark in this country). [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 11:28 am by Mark S. Humphreys
AFS/IBEX Financial Services, Inc., that would be interesting for these business people. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 10:27 am
Claim construction receives plenary review on appeal. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:40 pm by Danny Jacobs
District Court in Baltimore, just a few hundred feet from the United Way office at 100 S. [read post]