Search for: "United States v. California" Results 9701 - 9720 of 13,835
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
Entertainment Merchants Ass'n, 131 S.Ct. 2729 (2011)), videotaping animal cruelty (United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm by Brad Pauley
Review Granted United Parcel Service Wage and Hour Cases, S197722—Review Granted and Held—December 21, 2011 The court ordered briefing deferred pending the decision in Kirby v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 1:14 pm by Sheldon Toplitt
Facebook (Case No. 5:11-cv-01726), United States District Court for the Northern District of California Judge Lucy H. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 12:26 pm by Anthony Zaller
 However, shortly after this ruling, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:15 am by Nicole Huberfeld
  To the surprise of many, the United States’ amicus brief not only supported California but also urged that no private right of action exists for beneficiaries of federal spending programs (generally) to enforce federal standards against states. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 5:17 am by Mandelman
 Stein filed the first lawsuit against Bank of America that came to be know as a “mass joinder,” or multi-plaintiff suit… Ronald v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by Ken
It’s not retaliation against him, though, because he claims the address actually belongs to a “United States Judge” (by which he means a state judge, even though any lawyer would interpret that as a reference to a federal judge), and that I am PUTTING A JUDGE IN DANGER. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:31 pm by Rick Hasen
Lane, 66 Ohio State Law Journal 177 (2005) The California Recall Punch Card Litigation: Why Bush v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 5:32 am
Southern California's larger legal community makes this kind of case less likely in Orange County, but businesses and lawyers across the United States should be barred from abusing their power. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:50 am by Victoria VanBuren
Supreme Court decided several cases related to arbitration: On April 27, 2011, in a 5-4 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the the Federal Arbitration Act preempted California law with regard to class arbitration in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 9:38 pm
The United States District Court in San Jose, California refused to grant a motion to dismiss which states that Facebook ads violate its user's right of publicity by utilizing their names and photographs without authorization. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 6:56 pm
The State of California does not allow a debtor to use Federal bankruptcy exemptions under Title 11 of the United States Code ("Title 11 U.S.C.). [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 6:36 am by Schachtman
INS, 240 F.3d 642, 645 n.7 (7th Cir. 2001) (Nazi deportation); United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 12:27 am
., a church in which, as the United States Supreme Court expressed it in its 1872 decision in Watson v. [read post]