Search for: "Key v State" Results 9721 - 9740 of 22,474
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2017, 7:41 am by Tibbie McIntyre
Information from the conference webpage states that “The Conference aims at launching the debate and laying the foundations for the construction of an EU unitary Copyright. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 2:16 pm by Lyle Denniston
 The key question in the case is whether it violates the federal Constitution to deny religious organizations equal access to state benefits that have nothing to do with religion. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 6:07 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Pietrantoni 1 Given the likelihood of a Title III proceeding under the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management and Economic Stability Act (PROMESA) for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and certain of its instrumentalities in the near future,2 we thought it useful to outline some, but by no means all, of the key issues that are likely to be raised. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 4:26 am by Jon Hyman
When a judicial opinion starts out with a quote such as this, it’s usually not a good sign for the defendant, unless you happen to be the United Auto Workers, the defendant in Phillips v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 8:00 am by Orin Kerr
As elucidated by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida [in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 11:09 am by Alyson Carney
By typing key words such as “Immigration Collateral Consequences” or a case name such as “Chaidez v. [read post]
            Department of State (DOS): DOS Acquisition Regulation (DOSAR) § 652.239-71—This clause notes that contractor failure to comply could result in contract termination. 48 CFR 652.239-71(m). [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 11:25 am by Eric Goldman
This reminds me of the lawsuits against Twitter and other social media services for publishing content that plaintiffs have argued “materially supports” terrorist organizations, such as Fields v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 8:18 am
Analogy with Arrow case unhelpful given factual differences between the caseMichael agreed that there are key differences between the facts of Arrow v Merck and the present case - an observation also made by Carr J in his judgment when he sounded a note of caution on the use of the term "Arrow" declarations. [read post]