Search for: "Does 1 to 50" Results 9741 - 9760 of 16,116
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2013, 6:36 am by Howard Knopf
  Why would AUCC concede that “The Fair Dealing Policy does not permit the circumvention of digital locks to obtain access to copyright-protected works? [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 6:30 am by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
She is the author of the #1 selling book on cost containment, Workers Compensation Management Program: Reduce Costs 20% to 50%. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 8:48 pm by TDot
But I figure it’s a timely rehash since folks got their bar results over the Labor Day weekend, so hopefully you’ll forgive me So you’ve gone from being a doe-eyed proto-lawyer nurtured in the ivy-covered walls of legal academia for the past three years, and grown into a bona fide at-least-minimally-competent attorney-at-law.1 Now what do you do? [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:33 pm by Brad Kuhn
  Caltrans' appraiser valued the take at just over $1 million, with no amount for precondemnation damages. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:38 am by Florian Mueller
It states that security to the amount of 100 million euros ($132 million) is required to prevent further enforcement of the injunction (further below you can see it's twice 50 million euros for technically two injunctions), an amount that is disproportionately high considering how blindingly obvious the invalidity of this patent is. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:37 pm by Ilya Somin
The authority granted in section 2 does not authorize the use of the United States Armed Forces on the ground in Syria for the purpose of combat operations. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:30 pm by Maxwell Blum
  While rent did rise somewhat in a tight 1-3 mile radius around a non-attaining monitoring device as the area came into compliance, there was a weaker connection. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 8:03 pm by Wells Bennett
 (To be sure, Section Three does not literally bar the introduction of armed ground forces, period. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 3:40 pm by Eugene Volokh
[The court concludes, based on this, that conviction for violation of subdivision 1 does not require proof of any bodily harm. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 7:24 am by emagraken
  The “Legal Basis” section said in its entirety: 1. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
”9 Thus, we can break theft of movable property under the Model Penal Code into three elements: (1) unlawful taking or control, (2) of movable property of another, and (3) with intent to deprive. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 1:24 pm by Larry Catá Backer
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013) I have been posting about the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law." [read post]
31 Aug 2013, 6:42 am by Dan Harris
But it does mean you will have some leverage if things go wrong and it does mean you will at least have a chance. [read post]
31 Aug 2013, 1:40 am by Florian Mueller
That's what I saw right away on March 1, but I was alone in doing so.Again, we need to see now how the court rules on the motion to strike, but at least Apple will, realistically speaking, get to present the corresponding portion of last year's claim minus the adjustments of the damages periods. [read post]