Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 9741 - 9760
of 21,692
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2016, 7:30 am
Moreover, the employer’s motion to dismiss was denied (Gazvoda v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 12:46 pm
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 7:13 pm
§ 1605.1 (citing United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 8:36 am
Gould v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 10:53 am
Additional Resources: Hurst v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 2:19 pm
At the first conference, coming up in just two weeks, I'll be speaking about inequitable conduct in the wake of Therasense v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 8:53 pm
To state a claim for infringement under California common law, a plaintiff must allege 1) its prior use of the trademark and 2) the likelihood of the infringing mark being confused with its mark. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:00 pm
For example, in Stephens v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 9:10 am
See United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 8:18 am
This year marks the 100th anniversary of the Supreme Court decision Abrams v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:40 pm
Last week in Visa International Service Assoc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 12:05 am
Vaughen v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 2:31 pm
In James v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:06 am
Presbyterian Church of Sudan v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:26 am
Florida v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:05 am
Corp. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:03 am
See State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 9:39 am
Gonzalez-Perez, V. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:07 pm
As Janer prepares to test the defense in Bay County, a state Court of Appeals is grappling with the same issues in the case of People v. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 6:42 am
Bruce Fischer, Esq., P.C., 78 AD3d 1016, 1018 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
