Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 9741 - 9760
of 21,692
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2015, 10:05 am
The juvenile life-without-parole cases are something of a question mark. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:13 am
Marks & Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd & Anor, heard 7 October 2015. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:00 am
nolanguage=en+-+t-623373. [9] 56th Miller Lecture: Internet Revolutionized Creativity, Changing IP Law, Georgia State University (Sep. 17, 2015), http://law.gsu.edu/2015/09/17/56th-miller-lecture/. [10] Williams v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 6:33 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 3:35 am
” It is my sense that NFIB v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 2:50 am
People v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 3:38 pm
See Opryland USA Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 2:59 pm
Selden and the decision in question is Columbia Motor Car Co. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 11:01 am
Pinterest, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 6:18 am
Free Kick Master LLC v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:32 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has given its ruling today in Case C-20/14 BGW Marketing- & Management-Service GmbH v Bodo Scholz, following a request by the German Bundespatentgericht for a preliminary ruling from the CJEU back in January 2014. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:10 am
Multi Time Machine, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 4:38 am
In the Interflora case, part of the allegation of trade mark infringement was that Marks & Spencer did not employ negative matching when using, among other words and generic terms, the keyword which also constituted its trade mark Interflora. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 6:34 pm
” Connell raises two fundamental objections to the course of conduct order under McKaskle v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 4:31 pm
Activist journalism v objectivity Drum is an early example of black journalists running foul of the state. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 8:22 am
., et al. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 6:21 am
Malleiro v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 6:01 am
United Kingdom and Delfi AS v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 7:44 am
For the first time since February, proceedings in military commissions case United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am
The judge erred by proceeding on the basis that the global award did not need to be proportionate to that scale and that he could focus on compensation by adopting a “single wrong by single wrong” basis for compensation. (2) The size of the awards is disproportionate by reference to awards by the European Court of Human Rights for breaches of privacy. (3) There has been double-counting in the awards of… [read post]
