Search for: "Unit, Inc., Appeal of" Results 9761 - 9780 of 13,898
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2015, 9:00 am by Kirk Jenkins
StubHub, Inc. for determining when a home-rule unit may concurrently regulate areas of statewide concern. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 12:51 am
  The Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court ruling that the Nollan/Dolan test does not apply to a facial challenge of a land use regulation. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 4:17 am by D. Daniel Sokol
MillerAssociate Justice, California Court of Appeal•Hon. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-309). [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
After transfer of the property from Signal Puako Corp. to Puako Hawaii Properties, a limited partnership under Nansay Hawaii, Inc., the LUC Decision and Order was amended in 1991, reducing the project density to 1,560 housing units, provided that no less than 1,000 units be "affordable. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
Laroe Estates, Inc., the justices ruled that an as-of-right intervenor must have standing if it is seeking relief not requested by a plaintiff in the case. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike’s Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog)   US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal… [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 1:51 pm by Joseph Sano
Chartis also notes that two such decisions (allowing assignment) are pending before the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, citing In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc., 385 B.R. 560, 567 (Bankr. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE COLD WAR MUSEUM… [read post]