Search for: "United States v. California" Results 9761 - 9780 of 13,835
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2011, 1:08 pm by Greg Mersol
Posted by Greg MersolAnother court has weighed in in favor of enforcing an arbitration agreement containing a class action waiver in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 9:44 am by Sam Favate
“The Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 7:04 am by Frank O'Donnell, Clean Air Watch
Iowa has approved two permits while California, Kansas, Louisiana, Minnesota, New York, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Utah, and Wisconsin have issued one each. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 2:31 am by SHG
The Court even said it was “not anxious to attribute a deliberate, intentional, and devious motive” to the Government.1  For an example of a court’s reluctance to make those findings, see United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 10:32 am by Venkat
Facebook argued in its filings that Faceporn targets a United States audience by using a ".com" address, and by virtue of the fact that Faceporn is an interactive website with 250 users in California and 1000 users in the United States. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 1:34 pm by Brian Wright
  If the recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Creative Montessori Learning Centers v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 11:56 am by Brad Pauley
Cloverleaf Creamery Co. (1981) 449 U.S. 456, 464, 101 S.Ct. 715, 66 L.Ed.2d 659 (Minnesota), citing United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 11:15 am by Sean Wajert
 Plaintiff contended, however, that the court had specific jurisdiction because Dow allegedly knew that its gas tanks were being installed in products that would be sold in the United States, including California. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:10 pm by LTA-Editor
His recent attempt to register “Eat More Kale” with the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO), however, irked Georgia-based Chick-fil-A, which sent him a cease-and-desist letter claiming the marks are confusingly similar, according to press accounts. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 In addition to being strong and thoughtful statements of United States policy, these two speeches provide the framework within which my observations here can be better understood. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 8:00 am by The Docket Navigator
Here, the allegedly infringing products that are ordered by foreign customers were manufactured outside the United States, and distributed to customers outside of the United States. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-6602; Cox v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:15 pm by Mandelman
” Now, as to why robo-signing only seems to be a serious prosecutable crime in the State of Nevada? [read post]