Search for: "Asbestos Litigation"
Results 961 - 980
of 2,210
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2014, 6:51 am
The union representing laborers employed by the employer on its asbestos abatement projects was engaged in protest activities directed at the employer. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 5:43 pm
The court stated that the exclusivity bars are upheld for these two reasons: They are intended to prevent double recovery and to prevent the proliferation of litigation. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 9:05 am
Unlike previously litigated and well-known toxicity injuries (i.e. asbestos causing asbestosis; silica causing silicosis; and cigarette smoke causing lung cancer and heart disease), CDA caused by a zinc-induced copper deficiency is not “medically accepted” and was therefore subject to a two-part Daubert hearing[2]to establish general and specific causation. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 1:59 pm
The guy was apparently a kindly old gentleman with an Irish brogue, and also an engineer, and indeed made most of his money in the litigation game. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
They are, however, wrong to distort Selikoff’s record of participating in the litigation process. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 6:00 am
Rob has particular expertise in defending cases arising under the Longshore Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, as well as in maritime and asbestos litigation. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am
” The above hypothetical is very much analogous to cases that occur in asbestos personal injury and property damage litigation. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 12:20 pm
Two particularly perfidious myths perpetrated by the asbestos litigation industry is that crocidolite was not used in the United States, and that chrysotile is as potent in causing mesothelioma as is crocidolite. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 8:58 am
[Click here to see the rest of this post]Found onRelated articlesMerck to pay $100 million in NuvaRing contraceptive settlement (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)The Selling of Prescription Drugs: A Major Change in Sales Strategy (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)Lawyer recalls first meeting with woman who started Risperdal litigation (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)Asbestos Corporation and Its Defense Lawyers to Face Justice for Destroying Evidence… [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 4:49 am
It has been a decade long legal battle to seek justice against an ultimate wrongdoer.The determination of the the same lawyers who mounted successful cases against: the asbestos industry, big tobacco and lead paint companies, once again achieved victory in the civil justice system.While workers' compensation is a primary and limited payment of benefits, the real force for potential change in behavior is the responsibility imposed through litigation in the civil justice system… [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am
Irwin Stoloff) hedged, but acknowledged that both asbestos and tobacco contributed, with asbestos perhaps more so. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:13 pm
Peters, Asbestos Pathogenesis and Litigation, 13 The Sourcebook on Asbestos Diseases: Medical, Legal, and Technical Aspects 149 (1996). [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 7:27 pm
Perhaps in the fullness of time, when there is no more asbestos litigation, the archives will be fully digitized. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 8:13 am
Anonymous, “The Pulmonary Asbestos Menace,” 9(9) The Asbestos Worker (1930). [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 6:00 am
In other words, not every feature of the overall asbestos litigation is necessarily present in every case. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:40 pm
The conspiracy of the asbestos industry to conceal information of the hazards of asbestos has been long alleged and has been a foundation of asbestos litigation. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 8:25 am
Frank testifies fairly extensively for plaintiffs in asbestos litigation. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 9:18 am
Ontario construction law boutique Robson Carpenter is looking for a litigation lawyer to join their team. [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 12:40 pm
It is for that reason that significant litigation is often needed to prove when and where the asbestos exposure occurred. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:44 am
In the Trigger litigation, the Supreme Court held (Lord Phillips dissenting) on a consideration of Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services[5] that the relevant date on which employers’ liability insurance policies will be triggered is the date (or dates) on which the victim was exposed to the asbestos, not the date when mesothelioma first manifests in the victim. [read post]
